<b>Aluminum toxicity in roots of legume seedlings assessed by topological analysis

  • Simone Meredith Scheffer-Basso Universidade de Passo Fundo
  • Bruna Carla Priori Universidade de Passo Fundo
Palavras-chave: Adesmia, altitude, Lotus, magnitude, path length, Trifolium

Resumo

The effect of aluminum (Al) on roots has been evaluated based on linear and weight measurements, but how this element influences the branching configuration of the root system remains unknown. The objective of this study was to assess aluminum toxicity in the roots of 21-day old seedlings from three forage legumes using topological analysis: Adesmia latifolia, Trifolium repens and T. pratense. The legumes were grown in dystrophic Red Latosol that had either been treated or not treated with dolomitic lime. This resulted in two Al saturation and pH treatments: (a) Al= 0%, pH= 6.2; and (b) Al= 16%, pH= 4.8. The following attributes were determined: number of first-order roots, external links (magnitude), total links in the longest unique path (altitude), total links in the primary root (primary root altitude), total exterior path length, total links, internal links, branching points and proportion of branching in the primary root. The topological variables were significantly reduced by Al for all of the legume species. There was a more randomized or dichotomous branching configuration in the seedlings grown in acid soil and A. latifolia was the most plastic of the species. 

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Simone Meredith Scheffer-Basso, Universidade de Passo Fundo
Eng. Agr., mestre e doutor em Zootecnia pela UFRGS. Professora da Universidade de Passo Fundo, bolsista produtividade CNPQ, coord. do pós-graduação em Agronomia da UPF.
Publicado
2014-11-25
Como Citar
Scheffer-Basso, S. M., & Priori, B. C. (2014). <b&gt;Aluminum toxicity in roots of legume seedlings assessed by topological analysis. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 37(1), 61-68. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v37i1.18362
Seção
Produção Vegetal

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus