Effects of waterlogging stress on plant-pathogen interaction between <i>Fusarium poae</i> and wheat/ barley
Resumo
Waterlogging stress is one of the abiotic factors which causes damage to crops affecting yield components and grain quality of wheat and barley. On the other hand, Fusarium poae is one of the most common Fusarium species isolated from wheat and barley. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of waterlogging and F. poae on disease parameters, yield components and grain quality of durum and bread wheat and barley. The experiment was carried out using pots under greenhouse conditions. Four treatments were applied: control/control (W0F0), control/F. poae (W0F1), waterlogging/control (W1F0) and waterlogging/F. poae (W1F1). The results showed that incidence, severity and FHB index of F. poae were higher in W0F1 compared to W1F1 suggesting that waterlogging treatment would be generating no favorable conditions for fungal growth. Therefore, yield components and grain composition and quality were significantly affected by the Fusarium presence and waterlogging treatment which could induce changes in parameters mainly related to the industrial quality of wheat and barley. These results highlight the behavior of wheat and barley under the combination of abiotic and biotic stress.
Downloads
Referências
Arduini, I., Orlandi, C., Pampana, S., & Masoni, A. (2016). Waterlogging at tillering affects spike and spikelet formation in wheat. Crop and Pasture Science, 67(7), 703-711. DOI: 10.1071/CP15417
Argüello, M. N., Mason, R. E., Roberts, T. L., Subramanian, N., Acuña, A., Addison, C. K., ... Gbur, E. (2016). Performance of soft red winter wheat subjected to field soil waterlogging: grain yield and yield components. Field Crops Research, 194(1), 57-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.04.040
Bostock, R. M., Pye, M. F., & Roubtsova, T. V. (2014). Predisposition in plant disease: exploiting the nexus in abiotic and biotic stress perception and response. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 52(1), 23-33. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-081211-172902
Boyacioglu, D., & Hettiarachchy, N. S. (1995). Changes in some biochemical components of wheat grain that was infected with Fusarium graminearum. Journal of Cereal Science, 21(1), 57-62. DOI: 10.1016/S0733-5210(95)80008-5
Brzozoski, B., Dawidziuk, K., & Bednarski, W. (2008). Gliadin degradation by proteases of Fusarium genus fungi in different in vivo and in vitro conditions. Polish Journal of Natural Sciences, 23(1), 188-206. DOI: 10.2478/v10020-008-0014-2
Buerstmayr, H., Legzdina, L., Steiner, B., & Lemmens, M. (2004). Variation for resistance to Fusarium head blight in spring barley. Euphytica, 137(3), 279-290. DOI: 10.1023/B:EUPH.0000040440.99352.b9
Covarelli, L., Beccari, G., Prodi, A., Generotti, S., Etruschi, F., Juan, C., ... Manes, J. (2015). Fusarium species, chemotype characterization and trichothecene contamination of durum and soft wheat in an area of Central Italy. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 95(3), 540-551. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.6772
de San Celedonio, R. P., Abeledo, L. G., & Miralles, D. J. (2014). Identifying the critical period for waterlogging on yield and its components in wheat and barley. Plant and Soil, 378(1-2), 265-277. DOI: 10.1007/S11104-014-2028-6
Dick, J. W., & Quick, J. S. (1983). A modified screening test for rapid estimation of gluten strength in early-generation durum wheat breeding lines. Cereal Chemistry, 60(4), 315-318.
Dinolfo, M. I., Barros, G. G., & Stenglein, S. A. (2012). Development of a PCR assay to detect Fusarium poae isolates with the potential to produce nivalenol. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 332(2), 99-104. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2012.02581.x
Di Rienzo, J. A., Casanoves, F., Balzarini, M. G., Gonzalez, L., Tablada, M., & Robledo, C. W. (2012). InfoStat versión 2012. Córdoba, AR: Grupo InfoStat, FCA, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Retrieved on Sep. 30, 2017 from http://www.infostat.com.ar
Eggert, K., Wieser, H., & Pawelzik, E. (2010). The influence of Fusarium infection and growing location on the quantitative protein composition of (Part II) naked barley (Hordeum vulgare nudum). European Food Research and Technology, 230(6), 893-902. DOI: 10.1007/s00217-010-1229-3
Eggert, K., Hashadrai, M. R., & Pawelzik, E. (2011). In vitro degradation of wheat gluten fractions by Fusarium graminearum proteases. European Food Research and Technology, 233(4), 697-705. DOI: 10.1007/s00217-011-1566-x
Fan, X. M., Jiang, D., Dai, T. B., Jing, Q., & Cao, W. X. (2004). Effects of post-anthesis drought and waterlogging on the quality of grain formation in different wheat varieties. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 28(1), 680-685.
Gupta, R. B., & MacRitchie, F. (1991). A rapid one-step one dimensional SDS-procedure for analysis of subunit composition of glutenin in wheat. Journal Cereal of Science, 14(2), 105-109.
Herzog, M., Striker, G. G., Colmer, T. D., & Pedersen, O. (2016). Mechanisms of waterlogging tolerance in wheat- a review of root and shoot physiology. Plant, Cell and Environment, 39(5), 1068-1086. DOI: 10.1111/pce.12676
Huang, B. R., Johnson, J. W., Nesmith, D. S., & Bridges, D. C. (1994). Root and shoot growth of wheat genotypes in response to hypoxia and subsequent resumption of aeration. Crop Science, 34(6), 1538-1544. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1994.0011183X003400060023x
Jiang, D., Yue, H., Wollenweber, B., Tan, W., Mu, H., Bo, Y., ... Cao, W. (2009). Effects of post-anthesis drought and waterlogging on accumulation of high-molecular-weight glutenin subunits and glutenin macropolymers content in wheat grain. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 195(2), 89-97. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-037x.2008.00353.x
McMullen, M., Bergstrom, G., De Wolf, E., Dill-Macky, R., Hershman, D., Shaner, G., & Van Sanford, D. (2012). A unified effort to fight an enemy of wheat and barley: Fusarium Head Blight. Plant Disease, 96(12), 1712-1728. DOI: 10.1094/PDIS-03-12-0291-FE
Miedaner, T., & Longin, C. F. H. (2014). Genetic variation for resistance to Fusarium head blight in winter durum material. Crop and Pasture Science, 65(1), 46-51. DOI: 10.1071/CP13170
Qi, J. C., Chen, J. X., Wang, J. M., Wu, F. B., Cao, L. P., & Zhang, G. P. (2005). Protein and hordein fraction content in barley seeds as affected by sowing date and their relation to malting quality. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B, 6(11), 1069-1075. DOI: 10.1631/jzus.2005.B1069
Salgado-Albarrán, M., Herrera-Díaz, J., & Dinkova, T. D. (2015). Caracterización de patrones de hordeínas en variedades mexicanas de cebada maltera. Revista Especializada en Ciencias Químicas-Biológicas, 18(1), 43-51.
Shao, G. C., Lan, J. J., Yu, S. E., Liu, N., Guo, R. Q., & She, D. L. (2013). Photosynthesis and growth winter wheat in response to waterlogging at different growth stages. Photosynthetica, 51(3), 429-437. DOI: 10.1007/s11099-013-0039-9
Setter, T. L., & Waters, I. (2003). Review of prospects for germplasm improvement for waterlogging tolerance in wheat, barley and oats. Plant and Soil, 253(1), 1-34.
Shewry, P. R. (2009). Wheat. Journal of Experimental Botany, 60(6), 1537-1553. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erp058
Stenglein, S. A., Dinolfo, M. I., Barros, G., Bongiorno, F., Chulze, S. F., & Moreno, M. V. (2014). Fusarium poae pathogenicity and mycotoxin accumulation on selected wheat and barley genotypes at a single location in Argentina. Plant Disease, 98(12), 1733-1738. DOI: 10.1094/PDIS-02-14-0182-RE
Suzuki, N., Rivero, R.M., Shulaev, V., Blimwald, E., & Mittler, R. (2014). Abiotic and biotic stress combinations. New Phytologist Journal, 203(1), 32-43. DOI: 10.1111/nph.12797
Walker-Simmons, M. (1987). ABA levels and sensitivity in developing wheat embryos of sprouting resistant and susceptible cultivars. Plant Physiology, 84(1), 61-66. DOI: 10.1104/pp.84.1.61
Wiese, J., Kranz, T., & Schubert, S. (2004). Induction of pathogen resistance in barley by abiotic stress. Plant Biology, 6(5), 529-536. DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-821176.
Zheng, Y., Xu, X., Li, Z., Yang, X., Zhang, C., Li, F., & Jiang, G. (2009). Effects of salt and waterlogging stress at post-anthesis stage on wheat grain yield and quality. Journal of Applied Ecology, 20(10), 2391-2398.
DECLARAÇÃO DE ORIGINALIDADE E DIREITOS AUTORAIS
Declaro que o presente artigo é original, não tendo sido submetido à publicação em qualquer outro periódico nacional ou internacional, quer seja em parte ou em sua totalidade.
Os direitos autorais pertencem exclusivamente aos autores. Os direitos de licenciamento utilizados pelo periódico é a licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0): são permitidos o compartilhamento (cópia e distribuição do material em qualqer meio ou formato) e adaptação (remix, transformação e criação de material a partir do conteúdo assim licenciado para quaisquer fins, inclusive comerciais.
Recomenda-se a leitura desse link para maiores informações sobre o tema: fornecimento de créditos e referências de forma correta, entre outros detalhes cruciais para uso adequado do material licenciado.