How the perception of quality for beef evaluated by the buyer at the time of purchase: Study in three Brazilian cities of different sizes – Curitiba, Campo Mourão and Palotina

Vinicius Cunha Barcellos; Camila Mottin; Rodolpho Martin do Prado; Tiago Schenkel; Cibeli Viana; Ana Carolina Pelaes Vital; Luciano dos Santos Bersot; Carlos Sañudo; Ivanor Nunes do Prado

doi:10.4025/actascianimsci.v41i1.46533

Vinicius Cunha Barcellos Universidade Estadual de Maringá / Universidade Federal do Paraná
Camila Mottin Universidade Estadual de Maringá
Rodolpho Martin do Prado Universidade Estadual de Maringá http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3529-7783
Tiago Schenkel Universidade Castelo Branco
Cibeli Viana Universidade Federal de Viçosa
Ana Carolina Pelaes Vital Universidade Federal do Paraná
Luciano dos Santos Bersot Universidade Federal do Paraná
Carlos Sañudo Universidade de Saragoça
Ivanor Nunes do Prado Universidade Estadual de Maringá

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v41i1.46533

Resumo

In order to evaluate how beef buyers in the State of Paraná, Brazil south value meat quality indicators, and attributes of credibility, 519 interviews were conducted in three cities with different sizes (Big – Curitiba, Medium – Campo Mourão and Small – Palotina). The interviews were applied after the meat was placed in the shopping cart and were composed of five questions, including question of spontaneous response: (i) factors that the buyer considers at the purchasing time; (ii) information which the buyer considers important to appear on the meat label; and three questions of stimulated response: (i) preference for meat preparation and exposure for sale, (ii) factors that the buyer considers when purchasing the meat, and (iii) preference for marbling (by photograph) according to the beef preparation. The results showed that beef buyers are more concerned with extrinsic meat quality indicators than the intrinsic ones, especially the meat presentation and hygiene of the sale point; have little knowledge about the factors that positively influence the eating experience of beef and do not cares about attributes of credibility, except for the meat expiration date. Beef buyers from medium (Campo Mourão) and small (Palotina) cities have a similar behavior, and differ from the buyers of a big (Curitiba) city among the attributes surveyed, in relation to the greater appreciation of inspection, tenderness and marbling, and less importance given to the expiration date. Beef buyers prefer meat cut by the butcher; however, this preference is higher in the small city.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Vinicius Cunha Barcellos, Universidade Estadual de Maringá / Universidade Federal do Paraná

Food Science Post-Graduate Program, Universidade Estadual de Maringá,87020-900 - Maringá, Brazil

Tiago Schenkel, Universidade Castelo Branco

Post-Graduate student in Hygiene and Inspection of Products of Animal Origin, Universidade Castelo Branco, 20050-030 – Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Cibeli Viana, Universidade Federal de Viçosa

Veterinary Medicine Post-Graduate Program, Federal University of Viçosa, CEP 36.570-000, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil

Ana Carolina Pelaes Vital, Universidade Federal do Paraná

Food Science Post-Graduate Program, Universidade Estadual de Maringá,87020-900 - Maringá, Brazil

Luciano dos Santos Bersot, Universidade Federal do Paraná

Veterinary Science Department, Universidade Federal do Paraná, 85950-000 – Palotina, Brazil

Carlos Sañudo, Universidade de Saragoça

Departamento de Producción Animal y Ciencia de los Alimentos, Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón (IA2), Universidad de Zaragoza-CITA Miguel Servet 177, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain.

Ivanor Nunes do Prado, Universidade Estadual de Maringá

Animal Science Department, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, 87020-900 - Maringá, Brazil

Referências

Acebrón, L. B., & Dopico, D. C. (2000). The importance of intrinsic and extrinsic cues to expected and experienced quality: an empirical application for beef. Food Quality and Preference, 11(3), 229-238. doi: 10.1016/S0950-3293(99)00059-2.

American Meat Science Association [AMSA]. (2012). Meat color measurement guidelines. Savoy, IL: American Meat Science Association.

Becker, T. (2000). Consumer perception of fresh meat quality: a framework for analysis. British Food Journal, 102(3), 158-176. doi: 10.1108/00070700010371707.

Borgogno, M., Favotto, S., Corazzin, M., Cardello, A. V., & Piasentier, E. (2015). The role of product familiarity and consumer involvement on liking and perceptions of fresh meat. Food Quality and Preference, 44, 139-147. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.04.010.

Bredahl, L. (2004). Cue utilisation and quality perception with regard to branded beef. Food Quality and Preference, 15(1), 65-75. doi: 10.1016/S0950-3293(03)00024-7.

Chatterton, J., Graves, A., Audsley, E., Morris, J., & Williams, A. (2015). Using systems-based life cycle assessment to investigate the environmental and economic impacts and benefits of the livestock sector in the UK. Journal of Cleaner Production, 86, 1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.103.

Eiras, C. E., Guerrero, A., Valero, M. V., Pardo, J. A., Ornaghi, M. G., Rivaroli, D. C., ... Prado, I. N. (2017). Effects of cottonseed hulls levels in the diet and aging time on visual and sensory meat acceptability from young bulls finished in feedlot. Animal, 11(3), 529-537. doi: 10.1017/S1751731116001749.

Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute [FAPRI]. (2017). Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute. Retrived from http://www.fapri.iastate.edu/tools/outlook.aspx

Gellynck, X., Verbeke, W., & Vermeire, B. (2006). Pathways to increase consumer trust in meat as a safe and wholesome food. Meat Science, 74(1), 161-171. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.04.013

Grunert, K. G. (1995). Food quality: A means-end perspective. Food Quality and Preference, 6(3), 171-176. doi: 10.1016/0950-3293(95)00011-W.

Grunert, K. G. (1997). What's in a steak? A cross-cultural study on the quality perception of beef. Food Quality and Preference, 8(3), 157-174. doi: 10.1016/S0950-3293(96)00038-9.

Grunert, K. G. (2006). Future trends and consumer lifestyles with regard to meat consumption. Meat Science, 74(1), 149-160. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.04.016.

Guerrero, A., Rivaroli, D. C., Sañudo, C., Campo, M. M., Valero, M. V., Jorge, A. M., & Prado, I. N. (2018). Consumer acceptability of beef from two sexes supplemented with essential oil mix. Animal Production Science, 58(9), 1700-1707. doi: 10.1071/AN15306.

Halme, M., & Kallio, M. (2011). Estimation methods for choice-based conjoint analysis of consumer preferences. European Journal of Operational Research, 214(1), 160-167. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2011.03.049.

Monteschio, J. O., Souza, K. A., Vital, A. C. P., Guerrero, A., Valero, M. V., Kempinski, E. M. B. C., ... Prado, I. N. (2017). Clove and rosemary essential oils and encapsuled active principles (eugenol, thymol and vanillin blend) on meat quality of feedlot-finished heifers. Meat Science, 130, 50-57. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.04.002.

Mottin, C., Eiras, C. E., Maggioni, D., Barcelos, V. C., Ramos, T. R., & Prado, I. N. (2019). Influencing factors of consumer willingness to buy cattle meat: An analysis of survey data from three Brazilian cities. Acta Scientiarum Animal.Sciences, 41(43871), 1-10. doi: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v41i1.43871.

Oude Ophuis, P. A. M., & van Trijp, H. C. M. (1995). Perceived quality: A market driven and consumer oriented approach. Food Quality and Preference, 6(3), 177-183. doi: 10.1016/0950-3293(94)00028-T.

Prado, I. N., Cruz, O. T. B., Valero, M. V., Zawadzki, F., Eiras, C. E., Rivaroli, D. C., ... Visentainer, J. V. (2015a). Effects of glycerin and essential oils (Anacardium occidentale and Ricinus communis) on the meat quality of crossbred bulls finished in a feedlot. Animal Production Science, 55(12), 2105-2114. doi: 10.1071/AN14661.

Prado, I. N., Passetti, R. A. C., Rivaroli, D. C., Ornaghi, M. G., Souza, K. A., Carvalho, C. B., ... Moletta, J. L. (2015b). Carcass composition and cuts of bulls and steers fed with three concentrate levels in the diets. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 28(9), 1309-1316. doi: 10.5713/ajas.15.0021.

Saeed, F., & Grunert, K. G. (2014). Expected and experienced quality as predictors of intention to purchase four new processed beef products. British Food Journal, 116(3), 451-471. doi: 10.1108/BFJ-10-2011-0262.

Schönfeldt, H. C., & Hall, N. G. (2012). Consumer education on the health benefits of red meat — A multidisciplinary approach. Food Research International, 47(2), 152-155. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2011.04.035

Steenkamp, J. B. E. M., & van Trijp, H. C. M. (1996). Quality guidance: A consumer-based approach to food quality improvement using partial least squares. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 23(2), 195-215. doi: 10.1093/erae/23.2.195.

Taylor, J., van de Ven, R., & Hopkins, D. L. (2014). SmartShape™ technology. Modifying the shape of the beef cuberoll and the consumer response to shaped scotch fillet steaks. Meat Science, 96(3), 1125-1132. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.10.029.

Troy, D. J., & Kerry, J. P. (2010). Consumer perception and the role of science in the meat industry. Meat Science, 86(1), 214-226. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.05.009

van Loo, E. J., Caputo, V., Nayga Jr, R. M., & Verbeke, W. (2014). Consumers’ valuation of sustainability labels on meat. Food Policy, 49, 137-150. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.07.002.

van Wezemael, L., Caputo, V., Nayga Jr, R. M., Chryssochoidis, G., & Verbeke, W. (2014). European consumer preferences for beef with nutrition and health claims: A multi-country investigation using discrete choice experiments. Food Policy, 44, 167-176. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.11.006.

van Wezemael, L., Ueland, Ø., & Verbeke, W. (2011). European consumer response to packaging technologies for improved beef safety. Meat Science, 89(1), 45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2011.03.019

Vital, A. C. P., Guerrero, A., Kempinski, E. M. B. C., Monteschio, J. O., Sary, C., Ramos, T. R., ... Prado, I. N. (2018). Consumer profile and acceptability of cooked beef steks with edible and active coating containing oregano and rosemary essential oils. Meat Science, 143, 153-158. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.04.035.