<b>Effects on soil chemical attributes and cotton yield from ammonium sulfate and cover crops

  • Samuel Ferrari Universidade Estadual Paulista
  • Enes Furlani Júnior Universidade Estadual Paulista
  • Leandro José Grava de Godoy Universidade Estadual Paulista
  • João Vitor Ferrari Universidade Estadual Paulista
  • Wilson José Oliveira de Souza Universidade Estadual Paulista
  • Elza Alves Universidade Estadual Paulista

Resumo

Fertilizer use in no-till systems must be aligned with a correct interpretation of soil chemical attributes and crop demands. The objectives of this work were evaluate the effects of pre-sowing application of ammonium sulfate (AS) and of cover crops on the yields and soil chemical attributes of  no-till cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. r. latifolium Hutch) over two harvesting years. The experiment was arranged in randomized complete block design, with the plots in strips, and the variables were three cover crops (Raphanus sativus L., Avena strigosa L. and Avena sativa L.) and four AS doses (0, 150, 300, and 450 kg ha-1) applied over millet dry biomass. The cotton in the experimental plots was manually harvested on April 25, 2007 and April 24, 2008. The soil samples were collected between cotton rows in all plots on May 5, 2007 and May 12, 2008, at depths of 0.0-0.05, 0.05-0.10, and 0.10-0.20 m for soil fertility analyses. The increasing doses of AS induced lower soil pH, and calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg) levels in the superficial soil layer, as well as higher exchangeable aluminum (Al) and sulfur (S) levels until a depth of0.20 m. Seed cotton yields increased with increasing AS doses.

 

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.
Publicado
2014-11-25
Como Citar
Ferrari, S., Furlani Júnior, E., Godoy, L. J. G. de, Ferrari, J. V., Souza, W. J. O. de, & Alves, E. (2014). <b&gt;Effects on soil chemical attributes and cotton yield from ammonium sulfate and cover crops. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 37(1), 75-83. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v37i1.17972
Seção
Produção Vegetal

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus