Heterosis for the root distribution trait in common bean

  • Sibila Grigolo Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina
  • Rita Carolina de Melo Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina
  • Ana Carolina da Costa Lara Fioreze Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
  • Altamir Frederico Guidolin Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina
  • Jefferson Luís Meirelles Coimbra Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina
Palavras-chave: Phaseolus vulgaris L.; hybrid vigor; gene pools; genetic hypotheses.

Resumo

Heterosis has been one of the most studied phenomena since genetic studies were conceived. Knowledge of this phenomenon for the root distribution trait in beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) can favour the development of genotypes that are more tolerant to abiotic stresses. This study aimed to verify the occurrence of heterosis for the root distribution trait in hybrid F1 populations of common bean derived from crosses within and between gene groups. Thirty-six populations (six parents and 30 hybrids) were evaluated under field conditions in the agricultural years 2016/17 and 2017/18. The root distribution was assessed with the adapted Bohm method. The genotypes responded similarly to environmental changes (absence of an interaction). However, the root distribution differed significantly between the agricultural years. Comparisons between the mean of hybrids from crosses within each gene pool and the mean of parents did not reveal heterosis. The comparisons between gene groups showed significant differences only between BRS Embaixador x IPR Uirapuru, CBS 14 x IPR Uirapuru, and BAF 53 x IPR Uirapuru and the mean of parents. The absence of heterosis in the root trait can be explained by the degree of kinship between the gene groups, as well as some epistatic interactions.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Abreu, A. F. B., Ramalho, M. A. P., Santos, J. B., & Pereira Filho, I. A. (1990). Effect of genotype x environment interaction on estimations of genetic and phenotypic parameters of common beans. Revista Brasileira de Genética, 13(1), 75-82.

Allard, R. W. (1999). Principles of plant breeding (2nd ed.). New Jersey, US: John Wiley & Sons.

Bakheit, B. R., Ismail, A. A., El-Shiemy, A. A., & Sedek, F. S. (2001). Triple test cross analysis in four sesame crosses (Sesamum indicum L.). The Journal of Agricultural Science, 137(2), 185-193. DOI: 10.1017/S0021859601001204

Bakheit, B. R., El-Hifny, M. Z., Eissa, M. M., & Ragheb, S. B. (2002). Triple test cross and six-population techniques for partitioning the components of genetic variance in faba bean (Vicia faba). The Journal of Agricultural Science, 139(1), 61-66. DOI: 10.1017/S0021859602002216

Beebe, S. E., Rojas-Pierce, M., Yan, X., Blair, M. W., Pedraza, F., Muñoz, F., … Lynch, J. P. (2006). Quantitative trait loci for root architecture traits correlated with phosphorus acquisition in common bean. Crop Science, 46(1), 413-423. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2005.0226

Birchler, J. A., Yao, H., Chudalayandi, S., Vaiman, D., & Veitia, R. A. (2010). Heterosis. The Plant Cell, 22(7), 2105-2112. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.110.076133

Bitocchi, E., Nanni, L., Bellucci, E., Rossi, M., Giardini, A., Zeuli, P. S., … Papa, R. (2012). Mesoamerican origin of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is revealed by sequence data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(14), 788-796. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1108973109

Bohm, W. (1979). Methods of studying root systems. Berlin, GE: Springer.

Borel, J. C., Ramalho, M. A. P., & Abreu, A. F. B. (2016). Epistasis in intra- and inter-gene pool crosses of the common bean. Genetics and Molecular Research, 15(1), 1-10. DOI: 10.4238/gmr.15017573

Bruce, A. B. (1910). The mendelian theory of heredity and the argumentation of vigour. Science, 32(827), 627-628. DOI: 10.1126/science.32.827.627-a

Bruzi, A. T., Ramalho, M. A. P., & Abreu, A. F. B. (2007). Desempenho de famílias do cruzamento entre linhagens de feijões Andinos e Mesoamericanos em produtividade e resistência a Phaeoisariopsis griseola. Ciencia e Agrotecnologia, 31(3), 650-655. DOI: 10.1590/S1413-70542007000300008

Cardelino, R. A., & Siewerdt, F. (1992). Correct and incorrect use of test comparisons of means. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 21(6), 985-996.

Chalyk, S. T. (2000). Absence of heterosis in hybrid corn: a genetic analysis of the effect. Genetika, 36(9), 1237-1240.

Chen, Z. J. (2013). Genomic and epigenetic insights into the molecular bases of heterosis. Nature Reviews Genetics, 14(7), 471-482. DOI: 10.1038/nrg3503

Davenport, C. G. (1908). Degeneration, albinism and inbreeding. Science, 28(718), 454-455. DOI: 10.1126/science.28.718.454-b

East, E. M. (1908). Inbreeding in corn. Connecticut Agricultural Experimental Station Report, 1907, 419-428.

East, E. M. (1936). Heterosis. Genetics, 21(4), 375-397.

East, E. M., & Hayes, H. K. (1912). Heterozygosis in evolution and in plant breeding. Washington, DC: USDA.

Freitas, F. O. (2006). Evidências genético-arqueológicas sobre a origem do feijão comum no Brasil. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 41(7), 1199-1203. DOI: 10.1590/S0100-204X2006000700018

Gioia, T., Logozzo, G., Attene, G., Bellucci, E., Benedettelli, S., Negri, V., & Zeuli, P. S. (2013). Evidence for introduction bottleneck and extensive inter-gene pool (Mesoamerica x Andes) hybridization in the european common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) germplasm. PLoS ONE, 8(10), 1-14. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075974

Hallauer, A. R., Carena, M. J., & Miranda Filho, J. B. (1988). Quantitative genetics in maize breeding. Plant Science, 6, 477-523. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-0766-0

Johnson, W. C., & Gepts, P. (1999). Segregation for performance in recombinant inbred populations resulting from inter-pool crosses of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Euphytica, 106(1), 45-56. DOI: 10.1023/A:1003541201923

Johnson, W. C., & Gepts, P. (2002). The role of epistasis in controlling seed yield and other agronomic traits in an Andean x Mesoamerican cross of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Euphytica, 125(1), 69-79. DOI: 10.1023/A:1015775822132

Keeble, F., & Pellew, C. (1910). The mode of inheritance of stature and time of flowering in peas. Genetics, 1(1), 47-56. DOI: 10.1007/BF02981568

Khotyleva, L. V., Kilchevsky, A. V., & Shapturenko, M. N. (2017). Theoretical aspects of heterosis. Russian Journal of Genetics: Applied Research, 7(4), 428-439. DOI: 10.1134/S2079059717040049

Koenig, R., & Gepts, P. (1989). Allozyme diversity in wild Phaseolus vulgaris: further evidence for two major centers of genetic diversity. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 78, 809-817. DOI: 10.1007/BF00266663

Moreto, A. L., Ramalho, M. A. P., & Bruzi, A. T. (2012). Epistasis in an Andean x Mesoamerican cross of common bean. Euphytica, 186(3), 755-760. DOI: 10.1007/s10681-011-0578-8

Reynolds-Henne, C., Langenegger, A., Mani, J., Schenk, N., Zumsteg, A., & Feller, U. (2010). Interactions between temperature, drought and stomatal opening in legumes. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 68(1), 37-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2009.11.002

Rossi, M., Bitocchi, E., Bellucci, E., Nanni, L., Rau, D., Attene, G., & Papa, R. (2009). Linkage disequilibrium and population structure in wild and domesticated populations of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Evolutionary Applications, 2(4), 504-522. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2009.00082.x

Schmutz, J., McClean, P. E., Mamidi, S., Wu, G. A., Cannon, S. B., Grimwood, J., … Jackson, S. A. (2014). A reference genoma for common bean and genomw-wide analysis of dual domestications. Nature Genetics, 46(7), 707-713. DOI: 10.1038/ng.3008

Schnable, P. S., & Springer, N. M. (2013). Progress toward understanding heterosis in crop plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 64, 71-88. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042110-103827

Seidel, S. J., Rachmilevitch, S., Schutze, N., & Lazarovitch, N. (2016). Modelling the impact of drought and heat stress on common bean with two different photosynthesis model approaches. Environmental Modelling & Software, 81, 111-121. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.04.001

Shull, G. H. (1908). The composition of a field of maize. Journal of Heredity, 49(1), 296-301. DOI: 10.1093/jhered/os-4.1.296

Shull, G. H. (1948). What is “Heterosis”? Genetics, 33(5), 439-446.

Singh, S., & Singh, R. B. (1976). Triple test cross analysis in two wheat crosses. Heredity, 37(2), 173-177.

Smith, N. C., & Lee, E. A. (2016). Heterosis and growth in a developing maize plant. Maydica, 61(3), 1-9.

Subbaraman, N., & Rangasamy, S. R. S. (1989). Triple test cross analysis in rice. Euphytica, 42, 35-40. DOI: 10.1007/BF00042612

Topp, C. N., Bray, A. L., Elis, N. A., & Liu, Z. (2016). How can we harness quantitative genetic variation in crop root systems for agricultural improvement? Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 58(3), 213-225. DOI: 10.1111/jipb.12470

Velho, L. P. S., Melo, R. C. de, Bernardy, J. P. F., Grigolo, S., Guidolin, A. F., & Coimbra, J. L. M. (2018). Root distribution and its association with bean growth habit. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 90(2), 1-8. DOI: 10.1590/0001-3765201820170341

Zhou, G., Chen, Y., Yao, W., Zhang, C., Xie, W., Hua, J., ... Zhang, Q. (2012). Genetic composition of yiels heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(39), 15847-15852. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1214141109

Publicado
2020-08-17
Como Citar
Grigolo, S., Melo, R. C. de, Fioreze, A. C. da C. L., Guidolin, A. F., & Coimbra, J. L. M. (2020). Heterosis for the root distribution trait in common bean. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 43(1), e46712. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v43i1.46712
Seção
Genética e Melhoramento

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus