<b>Uni and multivariate methods applied to studies of phenotypic adaptability in maize (<em>Zea mays</em> L.)</b> - doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v33i4.6953

  • Esmael Lopes dos Santos Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa e ao Desenvolvimento do Agronegócio
  • Deoclécio Domingos Garbuglio Instituto Agronômico do Paraná
  • Pedro Mário de Araújo Instituto Agronômico do Paraná
  • Antonio Carlos Gerage Instituto Agronômico do Paraná
  • Pedro Sentaro Shioga Instituto Agronômico do Paraná
  • Cássio Egidio Cavenaghi Prete Universidade Estadual de Londrina
Palavras-chave: multivariate analysis, genotype x environment interaction, centroid method, bissegmented regression

Resumo

The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of 15 maize cultivars in seven locations in Paraná State, Brazil. Towards this aim, grain yield trials were conducted during two crop seasons, and centroid (multivariate) and bissegmented regression (univariate) methods were used to evaluate possible divergences among results obtained. The genotypes were evaluated in randomized complete blocks with three replications. The centroid method was effective for indicating productive potential of genotypes, allowing for classification of genotype adaptability and stability. Values of probability above 0.40 allowed more reliable genotype classification for both adaptability and stability. The STRIKE genotype presented wide adaptability and stability by both the centroid and bissegmented regression methods. The SHS 4040 and CD 306 genotypes were not indicated for planting, considering the tested environments.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.
Publicado
2011-05-04
Como Citar
Santos, E. L. dos, Garbuglio, D. D., Araújo, P. M. de, Gerage, A. C., Shioga, P. S., & Prete, C. E. C. (2011). <b>Uni and multivariate methods applied to studies of phenotypic adaptability in maize (<em>Zea mays</em> L.)</b&gt; - doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v33i4.6953. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 33(4), 633-639. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v33i4.6953
Seção
Melhoramento Vegetal

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus