<b>Performance of jundiá larvae, <em>Rhamdia quelen</em>, fed on probiotic supplemented diets

  • Vilson Borba Pinto Universidade Federal de Pelotas
  • Cristiano Costenaro-Ferreira Universidade Federal de Pelotas
  • Paulo Leonardo Silva Oliveira Universidade Federal de Pelotas
  • Rodrigo Ribeiro Bezerra de Oliveira Universidade Federal de Pelotas
  • Sérgio Renato Noguez Piedras Universidade Federal de Pelotas
  • Juvêncio Luis Osório Fernandes Pouey Universidade Federal de Pelotas
Palavras-chave: fish, uniformity, Bacillus cereus var. toyoi, Saccharomyces boulardii, Pichia pastoris

Resumo

Since probiotics have proved to be a viable alternative to antibiotics as enhancers of animal growth, the performance, uniformity and mortality rates of the jundiá (Rhamdia quelen) larvae fed on diets with different probiotics were evaluated. Jundiá larvae, aged four days post hatching, were fed during 21 days with the following diets, in four replicates, namely, CO: control feed, without probiotics; PP: feed with Pichia pastoris; SB: feed with Saccharomyces boulardii; BT: feed with Bacillus cereus var. toyoi. Among the tested probiotic, Bacillus cereus var. toyoi had the best results due to the fact that the larvae were 25% heavier than CO at the end of the first week; the difference increased to 28% by the end of the trial. Further, BT also improved uniformity and Fulton’s condition factor. Larvae fed on Saccharomyces boulardii had the lowest body weight, whereas those fed on Pichia pastoris grew similarly to the control diet. Mortality rate was not affected by treatments. Bacillus cereus var. toyoi improves the performance and uniformity of the larvae, but does not affect mortality rate.

 

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.
Publicado
2015-08-05
Como Citar
Pinto, V. B., Costenaro-Ferreira, C., Oliveira, P. L. S., Oliveira, R. R. B. de, Piedras, S. R. N., & Pouey, J. L. O. F. (2015). <b>Performance of jundiá larvae, <em>Rhamdia quelen</em&gt;, fed on probiotic supplemented diets. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences, 37(3), 215-220. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v37i3.27106
Seção
Aquicultura

0.9
2019CiteScore
 
 
29th percentile
Powered by  Scopus