Replacement of performance enhancers by propolis ethanol extract in broiler diets
Resumo
The present study was carried out to evaluate the substitution of synthetic performance enhancers by ethanolic propolis extract (EPE) in the diet of broilers and their effects on performance, carcass yield, noble cuts, viscera and bed quality. A completely randomized design was used, with four treatments and six replicates each, totaling 24 experimental plots with 20 birds each. The experimental treatments were: negative control, without the inclusion of performance improvement and EPE-free; positive control, containing avilamycin performance enhancer; Inclusion of 0.1% of EPE and; Inclusion of 0.2% EPE. The analyzed data were submitted to analysis of variance and applied the SNK test at 5% probability. There was no effect of the inclusion of additives on feed intake and feed conversion in the periods from 1 to 7, 1 to 21, and from 1 to 42 days of age. Weight gain was lower in birds receiving feed with the inclusion of 0.1% EPE in the period from 1 to 7 days, not differing from the other treatments in the other evaluation periods. Carcass characteristics, cuts, and viscera and bed moisture were not influenced by the treatments used. The inclusion of ethanol extract from propolis as a performance enhancer up to 42 days of age provided similar results to the use of performance enhancers based on avilamycin, thus being an efficient substitute in poultry production.
Downloads
Referências
Abudabos, A. M., Alyemni, A. H., Dafalla, Y. M., & Khan, R. U. (2016). The effect of phytogenic feed additives to substitute in-feed antibiotics on growth traits and blood biochemical parameters in broiler chicks challenged with Salmonella typhimurium. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(23), 24151-24157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7665-2
Alani, A. A. T., Alheeti, A. S. A., & Alani, E. N. S. (2019). Comparison between effect of adding propolis and antibiotic in in broiler chickens on productive performance and carcass traits. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 388, 1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/388/1/012032
Ali, A., Rane, A. S., Haq, Z., Khan, N., Bala, S., Gupta, M., & Wani, J. M. (2017). Comparative effect of polyherbal agents and organic acid to substitute antibiotic growth promoters in broilers for combating drus resistance. Environment and Ecology, 35(1A), 372-376. Retrieved from https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20173068146
Araujo, R. G. A. C., Polycarpo, G. V., Barbieri, A., Silva, K. M., Ventura, G., & Polycarpo, V. C. C. (2019). Performance and economic viability of broiler chickens fed with probiotic and organic acids in an attempt to replace growth-promoting antibiotics. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 21(2), 1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2018-0912
Bailey, C. A. (2020). Precision poultry nutrition and feed formulation. In Animal Agriculture Academic Press, 367-378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-817052-6.00021-5
Biswas, A., Mohan, N., Raza, M., Mir, N. A., & Mandal, A. (2019). Production performance, immune response and blood biochemical parameters in broiler chickens fed diet incorporated with prebiotics. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 103(2), 493-500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.13042
Casquete, R., Castro, S. M., Jácome, S., & Teixeira, P. (2016). Antimicrobial activity of ethanolic extract of propolis in “Alheira”, a fermented meat sausage. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 2(1), 1125773. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2015.1125774
Chacher, M. F. A., Kamran, Z., Ahsan, U., Ahmad, S., Koutoulis, K. C., Qutab, H. G., Din, U. D., & Cengiz, O. (2017). Use of mannan oligosaccharide in broiler diets: an overview of underlying mechanisms. World's Poultry Science Journal, 73: 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933917000757
Cobb 500®. (2012). Manual de manejo de frangos Cobb 500. São Paulo, SP: Cobb-Vantress Brasil.
Coelho, S., Silva, J. D., Oliveira, E. D., Amâncio, A. L. L., Silva, N. D., & Lima, R. M. B. (2010). A própolis e sua utilização em animais de produção. Archivos de Zootecnia, 59(232), 95-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21071/az.v59i232.4909
Costa, L. A. M. A., Barbosa, S. R., Holanda, G. C., & Flach, A. (2016). Teor de fenólicos e atividade antioxidante de própolis em áreas de floresta e savana de Roraima. Revista de Ciência e Tecnologia, 2(3), 1-11. Retrieved form https://revista.ufrr.br/rct/article/view/3869/2261
Cowieson, A. J., & Kluenter, A. M. (2019). Contribution of exogenous enzymes to potentiate the removal ofantibiotic growth promoters in poultry production. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 250, 81-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2018.04.026
El-Hack, M. E. A., Alagawany, M., Abdel-Moneim, A. M. E., Mohammed, N. G., Khafaga, A. F., Bin-Jumah, M., ... Elnesr, S. S. (2020). Cinnamon (Cinnamomum zeylanicum) Oil as a Potential Alternative to Antibiotics in Poultry. Antibiotics, 9(5), 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9050210
Eyng, C., Murakami, A. E., Pedroso, A. A., Duarte, C. R. A., & Picoli, K. P. (2017). Caecal microbiota of chickens fed diets containing propolis. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 101(3), 484-492. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12570
Eyng, C., Murakami, A. E., Pedroso, R. B., Silveira, T. G. V., Lourenço, D. A. L., & Garcia, A. F. Q. M. (2013). Crude propolis as an immunostimulating agent in broiler feed during the starter phase. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, 34(5), 2511-2522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2013v34n5p2511
Ferdous, F., Arefin, S., Rahman, M., Ripon, M. F., Rashid, H., Sultana, R., … Rafiq, K. (2019). Beneficial effects of probiotic and phytobiotic as growth promoter alternative to antibiotic for safe broiler production. Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research, 6(3), 409-415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5455/javar.2019.f361
Ferreira, D. F. (2003). Sisvar versão 4.2. Lavras, MG: DEX/UFLA.
Ferreira, H. A., Oliveira, M. C., & Traldi, A. B. (2004). Efeito de condicionadores químicos na cama de frango sobre o desempenho de frangos de corte. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, 56(4), 542-546. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-09352004000400017
Fogaça, I., Ferreira, E., Saturnino, K. C., Santos, T. R., Cavali, J., & Porto, M. O. (2017). Álcool para controle de cascudinho em cama de frangos de corte. Archivos de Zootecnia, 66(256), 509-514. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21071/az.v66i256.2766
Gandra, J. R., Nunes Gil, P. C., Gandra, E. R. S., Takiya, C. S., & Gobesso, A. A. O. (2015). Addition of increasing doses of ricinoleic acid from castor oil (Ricinus communis L.) in horse diets: intake, digestibility, glucose and insulin dynamic. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 45(1),71-75. DOI: 10.1080/09712119.2015.1125354
Genova, J. L., Rodrigues, R. B., Martins, J. S., Uczay, M., & Henriques, J. K. S. (2020). Própolis e pólen apícola na nutrição de animais não ruminantes. Archivos de zootecnia, 69(265), 124-131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21071/az.v69i265.5048
Gheisari, A., Shahrvand, S., & Landy, N. (2017). Effect of ethanolic extract of propolis as an alternative to antibiotics as a growth promoter on broiler performance, serum biochemistry, and immune responses. Veterinary world, 10(2), 249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2017.249-254
Hamed, M. M., El-Faham, A. I., El-Azeem, F. A., & El-Medany, N. M. (2017). Effect of some natural feed additives to substitute antibiotic as growth promoters on growth perfomance, carcass characteristics and economic efficiency of broiler chicks: 1-propolis. Egyptian J. Nutrition and Feeds, 20(2), 181-191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/ejnf.2017.104043
He, T., Long, S., Mahfuz, S., Wu, D., Wang, X., Wei, X., & Piao, X. (2019). Effects of Probiotics as Antibiotics Substitutes on Growth Performance, Serum Biochemical Parameters, Intestinal Morphology, and Barrier Function of Broilers. Animals, 9(11), 985. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9110985
Kamimura, C. T., Menão, M. C., Itaya, N. M., Knöbl, T., Gomes, G., & Pedroso, A. C. (2018). Avaliação da atividade antimicrobiana de extratos de Helianthus tuberosus L. e Smallanthus sonchifolius em cama de frangos. Atas de Saúde Ambiental-ASA, 6(1), 34-45. Retrieved from https://revistaseletronicas.fmu.br/index.php/ASA/article/view/1642/1309
Kavyani, A., Shahne, A. Z., PorReza, J., Haji-abadi, S. J., & Landy, N. (2012). Evaluation of dried powder of mushroom (Agaricus bisporus) as an antibiotic growth promoter substitution on performance, carcass traits and humoral immune responses in broiler chickens. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research, 6(1), 94-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/JMPR11.1168
Kim, J. W., Kim, J. H., & Kil, D. Y. (2015). Dietary organic acids for broiler chickens: a review. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Pecuarias, 28(2), 109-123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rccp.v28n2a01
Macari, M., & Maiorka, A. (2017). Fisiologia das aves comerciais. Jabotical, SP: Funep.
Macari, M., Mendes, A. A., Menten, J. F., & Naas, I. A. (2014). Produção de frangos de corte. Campinas, SP: FACTA.
Meimandipour, A., Nouri Emamzadeh, A., & Soleimani, A. (2017). Effects of nanoencapsulated aloe vera, dill and nettle root extract as feed antibiotic substitutes in broiler chickens. Archives Animal Breeding, 60(1), 1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-60-1-2017
Murakami, A. E., Eyng, E., Pedroso, R. B., Silveira, T. G. V., Lourenço, D. A. L., Garcia, A. F. Q. M. (2013). Crude propolis as an immunostimulating agent in broiler feed during the first stage. Ciências Agrárias, 34(5), 2511-2522. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2013v34n5p2511
Paz, A. S. D., Abreu, R. D., Costa, M. C. M. M., Luz Jaeger, S. M. P., Rocha, A. P. D., Ferreira, B. P., ... & Campos, B. M. (2010). Aditivos promotores de crescimento na alimentação de frangos de corte. Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal, 11(2), 395-402. Retrieved from https://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=DJ2012070991
Pinto, L. D. M. A., Prado, N. R. T., & Carvalho, L. B. (2011). Propriedades, usos e aplicações da própolis. Revista Eletrônica de farmácia, 8(3), 25-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5216/ref.v8i3.15805
Reis, T. L., & Vieites, F. M. (2019). Antibiótico, prebiótico, probiótico e simbiótico em rações de frangos de corte e galinhas poedeiras. Ciência Animal, 29(3), 133-147.
Rostagno, H. S., Albino, L. F. T., Donzele, J. L., Gomes, P. C., Oliveira, R. D., Lopes, D. C., ... Euclides, R. F. (2011). Tabelas brasileiras para aves e suínos: composição de alimentos e exigências nutricionais (3a. ed.). Viçosa, MG: DZO/UFV.
Santiago, G. S., Passarini, J. F., Cerqueira, J. A., & da Cunha, H. V. F. (2019). Avaliação da reutilização de cama de frango sobre a condenação de carcaças por colibacilose. PUBVET, 13(8), 153. Retrieved from https://bitlybr.com/d1M5o45
Shaddel-Tili, A., Eshratkhah, B., Kouzehgari, H., & Ghasemi-Sadabadi, M. (2017). The effect of different levels of propolis in diets on performance, gastrointestinal morphology and some blood parameters in broiler chickens. Bulgarian Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 20(3), 2145-224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15547/bjvm.986
Shirzadi, H., Shariatmadari, F., Karimi Torshizi, M. A., Rahimi, S., Masoudi, A. A., Zaboli, G., & Hedayat-Evrigh, N. (2019). Plant extract supplementation as a strategy for substituting dietary antibiotics in broiler chickens exposed to low ambient temperature. Archives of Animal Nutrition, 74(3), 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1745039X.2019.1693860
Souza, H. A., Oliveira, E. L., Faccioli-Martins, P. Y., Santiago, L., Primo, A. A., Melo, M. D., & Pereira, G. A. C. (2019). Physical and microbiological characteristics process of composting waste from animals. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, 71(1), 291-302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4162-9735
Tang, K. L., Caffrey, N. P., Nobrega, D. B., Cork, S. C., Ronksley, P. E., Barkema, H. W., ... Ghali, W. A. 2019. Comparison of different approaches to antibiotic restriction in food-producing animals: stratified results from a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Global Health, 4(4), 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001710
Valentim, J. K., Bitttencourt, T. M., Lima, H. J. D., Moraleco, D. D., Tossuê, F. J. M., Silva, N. E. M., ... & Silva, L. G. (2019). Pigmentantes vegetais e sintéticos em dietas de galinhas poedeiras Negras. Boletim de Indústria Animal, 76, 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17523/bia.2019.v76.e1438
Valentim, J. K., Lima, H. J. D. A., Bittencourt, T. M., Velarde, J. M. D. S., Silva, L. K. S. D., Procopio, D. P., ... Mendes, J. P. (2020). Quality of broilers fed diets containing dry distillery grains. Journal of Agricultural Studies, 8(1), 357-370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/jas.v8i1.16115
Valentim, J. K., Paula, K. L. C. D., Geraldo, A., Miranda, D. A., Lemke, S. S. R., Oliveira, M. J. K. D., & Oliveira, J. É. F. D. (2018). Use of probiotics in diets of wild-type chickens and its effects on performance. Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal, 19(3), 315-323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s151999402018000300008
Vogado, G. M. S., Vogado, K. T. S., Fonseca, W. J. L., Fonseca, W. L., Oliveira, A. M., Vogado, W. F., & Luz, C. S. M. (2016). Evolução da avicultura brasileira. Nucleus Animalium, 8(1), 49-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3738/21751463.1682
Yadav, A. S., Kolluri, G., Gopi, M., Karthik, K., & Singh, Y. (2016). Exploring alternatives to antibiotics as health promoting agents in poultry-a review. Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences, 4(3S),368-383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18006/2016.4(3S).368.383
Zanu, H. K., Keerqin, C., Kheravii, S. K., Morgan, N., Wu, S. B., Bedford, M. R., & Swick, R. A. (2020). Influence of meat and bone meal, phytase, and antibiotics on broiler chickens challenged with subclinical necrotic enteritis: 2. intestinal permeability, organ weights, hematology, intestinal morphology, and jejunal gene expression. Poultry Science, 99(5), 2581-2594. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2019.12.049
DECLARAÇÃO DE ORIGINALIDADE E DIREITOS AUTORAIS
Declaro que o presente artigo é original, não tendo sido submetido à publicação em qualquer outro periódico nacional ou internacional, quer seja em parte ou em sua totalidade.
Os direitos autorais pertencem exclusivamente aos autores. Os direitos de licenciamento utilizados pelo periódico é a licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0): são permitidos o compartilhamento (cópia e distribuição do material em qualqer meio ou formato) e adaptação (remix, transformação e criação de material a partir do conteúdo assim licenciado para quaisquer fins, inclusive comerciais.
Recomenda-se a leitura desse link para maiores informações sobre o tema: fornecimento de créditos e referências de forma correta, entre outros detalhes cruciais para uso adequado do material licenciado.
