Hedonic analysis of the price of mangalarga marchador horses sold at auctions

  • Mahara Moreira Marquez Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
  • Brenda Alves Alves dos Santos Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
  • Larissa Ferreira Mamede Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
  • Erica Beatriz Schultz Universidade Federal de Viçosa http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1916-2117
  • Natascha Almeida arques da Silva Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
  • Camila Raineri Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
Palavras-chave: comercial; equine; pricing.

Resumo

The objective was to identify sets of relevant atributes for pricing Mangalarga Marchador horses at auctions and to estimate a hedonic pricing function. We analyzed 452 horses at 20 auctions. The studied variables were characteristics intrinsic to the animals and attributes that influence sale price, which were identified through generalized linear and logistic model analysis. For each additional prize and additional bid, the prices decreased by R$ 2110.00 and R$ 549.00 respectively. The individual’s maternal grandsire positively or negatively affected prices, from R$ - 86.70 to R$ + 35.50. Non-pregnant females were penalized in price by R$ 110.00 compared to non-castrated males. A bay coat added R$ 215.00 to prices when compared to chestnut animals. Online auctions added R$ 20.10 to prices and virtual auctions penalized prices by R$ 617.00. The gray coat devalues a sale by 48% and Seller 3 decreasing by 18%. We conclude that auction type, number of prizes, share sold, animal category, coat, seller, number of bids, and maternal grandsire influenced the prices of Mangalarga Marchador horses, and that coat and seller that influenced the probability of the animal being sold.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Briquet, R. J. (1959). Genética da pelagem do cavalo. São Paulo, SP: Instituto de Zootecnia.

Buzby, J. C., & Jessup, E. L. (1994). The relative impact of macroeconomic and yearling-specific variables in determining thoroughbred yearling price. Applied Economics, 26, 1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036849400000055

Cabral, G. C., Carvalho Peres, A. A., Dias, A. C. C., Souza Tassinari, W., Almeida, M. I. V., & Almeida, F. Q. (2020). Horse Agribusiness in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: trade and economic aspects of Mangalarga Marchador farm production. Research, Society and Development, 9(11), e4319119938-e4319119938. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i11.9938

Edwards, J. H. (2001). The genetics of the horse. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02717913

Hafez, E. S. E., & Hafez, B. (2004). Reprodução Animal (7a ed., p. 530)., São Paulo, SP: Manole.

Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística [IBGE]. (2016). Censo Agropecuário. IBGE.

Lange, K. Y., Johnson, J. W., Wilson, K., & Johnson, W. (2010). Price Determinants of Ranch Horses Sold at Auction in Texas (NO. 1370-2016-108774). DOI: http://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.56491

Lansford Jr, N. H., Freeman, D. W., Topliff, D. R., & Walker, O. L. (1998). Hedonic pricing of race-bred yearling Quarter Horses produced by Quarter Horse sires and dams. Journal of Agribusiness, 16(2), 169-185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.90443

Machado Filho, C. A. P., & Zylbersztajn, D. (1999). Os leilões sob a ótica da economia institucional: Evidências no mercado bovino. Gestão and Produção, 6(3), 269-281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-530X1999000300011

McGreevy, P. D., Oddie, C. F., Hawson, L. A., McLean, A. N., & Evans, D. L. (2015). Do vendors value safety in Thoroughbred horses in the Australian recreational riding horse market?. Journal of Veterinary Behavior, 10(2), 153-157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2014.12.004

Maia, F. D. R. B., Silva, R. A., Maracaja, P. B., Marques, A. V. M. S., & de Oliveira, A. V. B. (2013). Tipos de Pelagens dos filhos de reprodutores machos ‘PO’ da raça quarta de milha em microrregião do sertão paraibano. Caderno Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentável, 3, 124-131.

Neibergs, J. S. (2001). A hedonic price analysis of thoroughbred broodmare characteristics. Agribusiness: An International Journal, 17(2), 299-314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.1017

Ng, T., Chong, T. T. L., Siu, M. T., & Everard, B. (2011). What determines the price of a racing horse?. Applied Economics, 45(3), 369-382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2011.605553

O’brien, R. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality and Quantity, 41, 673-690. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6

Oddie, C. F., Hawson, L. A., McLean, A. N., & McGreevy, P. D. (2014). Do vendors value safety in the Australian recreational (non-thoroughbred) riding horse market?. Journal of Veterinary Behavior, 9(6), 375-381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2014.07.001

Robbins, M., & Kennedy, P. E. (2001). Buyer behaviour in a regional thoroughbred yearling market. Applied Economics, 33(8), 969-977. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840010002529

Rossetti, J. P. (2003). Introduction to economy (20a ed.). São Paulo, SP: Atlas.

Santos, B. D. S., Brandi, R. A., & Gameiro, A. H. (2018). Study of the market and production of Brasileira de Hipismo horse breed in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. Pubvet, 12(2), 1-11. DOI: 10.22256/pubvet.v12n2a35.1-11

Taylor, M. R., Dhuyvetter, K. C., Kastens, T. L., Douthit, M., & Marsh, T. L. (2006). Show quality quarter horse auctions: price determinants and buy-back practices. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 31(3), 595-615. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.8631

United States Department of Agriculture [USDA]. (1954). Marketing: the yearbook of agriculture. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Varian, H. R. (2015). Microeconomia: uma abordagem moderna (Analytical Chemistry, 9a ed.). São Paulo,SP: Atlas.

Publicado
2023-10-18
Como Citar
Marquez , M. M., Santos, B. A. A. dos, Mamede, L. F., Schultz, E. B., Silva, N. A. arques da, & Raineri, C. (2023). Hedonic analysis of the price of mangalarga marchador horses sold at auctions . Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences, 46(1), e60913. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v46i1.60913
Seção
Produção Animal

0.9
2019CiteScore
 
 
29th percentile
Powered by  Scopus