Filiform papillae of Holstein heifer tongues and their relationship with Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus infestation

Resumo

Mammals’ self-cleaning behavior helps to reduce infestations of ectoparasites, especially ticks. We investigated the relationship between measurements of the filiform papillae of heifer tongues and tick infestation. To assess the papillae, biopsies were performed on the anterior surface of the tongues of 15 Holstein heifers. The samples were processed for evaluation by scanning electron microscopy. Statistical analysis was performed through a completely randomized design. The parameters studied were submitted to analysis of variance to determine the effect of infestation on the length and base width of the papillae, distance between bases and between tips, and number of papillae per unit area. Heifers with greater numbers of papillae (16.68 ± 3.30 cm2) and shorter filiform papillae (1.28 ± 0.35mm) had fewer ticks (P < 0.01) than heifers with fewer papillae (15.46 ± 1.91 cm2) and longer lengths (1.45 ± 0.39mm). We concluded that the morphology of the filiform papillae varies between cattle of the same breed and that the length and the number of papillae per unit area are related to tick infestation.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Akinyi, M. Y., Tung, J., Jeneby, M., Patel, N. B., Altmann, J., & Alberts, S. C. (2013). Role of grooming in reduction tick load in wild baboons (Papio cynocephalus). Animal Behavior, 85(3), 559–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.12.012

Benetti, E. J., Pícoli, L. C., Guimarães, J. P., Motoyama, A. A., Miglino, M. A., & Watanabe, L. S. (2009). Characteristics of filiform, fungiform and vallate papillae and surface of interface epithelium-connective tissue of the Maned Sloth tongue mucosa (Bradypus torquatus Iliger, 1811): Light and scanning electron microscopy study. Anatomia, Histologia, Embryologia, 38(1), 42–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0264.2008.00890.x

Bennett, G. F. (1969). Boophilus microplus: Experimental infestations on cattle restrained from grooming. Experimental Parasitology, 26(3), 323–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4894(69)90125-8

Boshell, J. L., Wilborn, W. H., & Singh, B. B. (1982). Filiform papillae of cat tongue. Acta Anatomica, 114(2), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1159/000145583

De Paz Cabello, P., Chamorro, C. A., Sandoval, J., & Fernandez, F. (1988). Comparative scanning electron-microscopic study of the lingual papillae in two species of domestic mammals (Equus caballus and Bos taurus). II. Mechanical papillae. Acta Anatomica, 132(2), 120–123. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3414356/

Dyce, K. M., Sack, W. O., & Wensing, C. J. G. (2004). Tratado de anatomia veterinária (3. ed.). Elsevier.

Eckstein, R. A., & Hart, B. L. (2000). Grooming and control of fleas in cats. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 68(2), 141–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00095-2

Eurell, J. A., Frappier, B. L., & Dellmann, H. (2006). Textbook of veterinary histology (6. ed.). Lea & Febiger.

Grisi, L., Leite, R. C., Martins, J. R. S., Barros, A. T. M., Andreotti, R., Cançado, P. H. D., Pérez de León, A. A., Pereira, J. B., & Villela, H. S. (2014). Reassessment of the potential economic impact of cattle parasites in Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Parasitology, 23(2), 150–156. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612014042

Hart, B. L. (2000). Role of grooming in biological control of ticks. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 916(1), 565–569. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb05337.x

Iwasaki, S. (2002). Evolution of the structure and function of the vertebrate tongue. Journal of Anatomy, 201(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-7580.2002.00073.x

Karnovsky, M. J. (1965). A formaldehyde-glutaraldehyde fixative of high osmolality for use in electron-microscopy. Journal of Cell Biology, 27, 137-138. https://www.scienceopen.com/document?vid=fc310cec-cfa9-45de-81fe-fb78f22ca683

Kemp, D. H., Koudstaal, D., Roberts, J. A., & Kerr, J. D. (1976). Boophilus microplus: The effect of host resistance on larval attachments and growth. Parasitology, 73(1), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031182000051386

Kilinc, M., Erdogan, S., Ketani, S., & Ketani, M. A. (2010). Morphological study by scanning electron microscopy of the lingual papillae in the middle east blind mole rat (Spalax ehrenbergi, Nehring, 1898). Anatomia, Histologia, Embryologia, 39(6), 509–515. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0264.2010.01022.x

Koudstaal, D., Kemp, D. H., & Kerr, J. D. (1978). Boophilus microplus rejection of larvae from British breed cattle. Parasitology, 76(3), 379–386. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031182000048241

Mooring, M. S., Blumstein, D. T., & Stoner, C. (2004). The evolution of parasite-defence grooming in ungulates. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 81(1), 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2004.00273.x

Mooring, M. S., & Hart, B. L. (1997). Self-grooming in impala mothers and lambs: Testing the body size and tick challenge principles. Animal Behaviour, 53(5), 925–934. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1996.0341

Mooring, M. S., McKenzie, A. A., & Hart, B. L. (1996). Grooming in impala: Role of oral grooming in removal of ticks and effects of ticks in increasing grooming rate. Physiology & Behavior, 59(4-5), 965–971. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(95)02186-8

Mooring, M. S., & Samuel, W. M. (1998). Tick defense strategies in bison: The role of grooming and hair coat. Behaviour, 135(6), 693–718.

Riek, R. F. (1956). Factors influencing the susceptibility of cattle to tick infestation. Australian Veterinary Journal, 32(8), 204–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-0813.1956.tb05660.x

Sari, E. K. (2010). Characteristics of dorsal lingual papillae of Zavot cattle. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 9(1), 123–130. https://doi.org/10.3923/javaa.2010.123.130

Shao, B. P., Long, R. J., Ding, Y. P., Wang, J. P., Ding, L. M., & Wang, H. C. (2010). Morphological adaptations of yaks (Bos grunniens) tongue to the foraging environment of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Animal Science, 88(8), 2594–2603. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-2398

Snowball, G. J. (1956). The effect of self-licking by cattle in infestations of cattle tick Boophilus microplus (Canestrini). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 7(3), 227–232. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9560227

Steflik, D. E., Singh, B. B., McKinney, R. V., Jr., & Boshell, J. L. (1983). Correlated TEM, SEM, and histological observation of filiform papillae of the cow tongue. Acta Anatomica, 117(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1159/000145767

Svejda, J., & Skach, M. (1975). The three-dimensional image of the lingual papillae. Folia Morphologica, 23(2), 145–159.

Veríssimo, C. J. (1993). Prejuízos causados pelo carrapato Boophilus microplus. Zootecnia, 31(3), 97–106.

Veríssimo, C. J., D’Agostino, S. M., Pessoa, F. F., Toledo, L. M., & Santos, I. K. F. M. (2015). Length and density of filiform tongue papillae: Differences between tick-susceptible and resistant cattle may affect tick loads. Parasites & Vectors, 8, Article 594. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-1196-4

Publicado
2026-03-12
Como Citar
D’Agostino, S. M., Pessoa, F. F., Toledo , L. M. de, Costa, R. L. D. da, Katiki, L. M., Tanaka, F. A. O., & Veríssimo , C. J. (2026). Filiform papillae of Holstein heifer tongues and their relationship with Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus infestation . Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences, 48(1), e74774. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v48i1.74774
Seção
Produção Animal

0.9
2019CiteScore
 
 
29th percentile
Powered by  Scopus