<b>Static and dynamic impairment following stroke reflecting hemispheric asymmetry for postural control

  • Suellen Marinho Andrade Universidade Federal da Paraíba
  • Bernardino Fernandéz-Calvo Universidade Federal da Paraíba

Resumo

This paper evaluates whether there is a relationship between postural control and hemispheric asymmetry following a stroke. Twenty right or left brain-damage patients and ten healthy control subjects were included in this study. The static (weight symmetry) and dynamic posture (velocity, maximal excursion and the directional control of the center of mass) were analyzed by quantitative posturography. Factors such as clinical neurological assessment, postural skills, muscle strength, spasticity, sensitivity and hemineglect were also collected. Results showed that in static posture, right-brain-damaged patients had worse performance. In the dynamic tests, left-brain-damaged patients were selectively impaired on maximal excursion and the directional control of the center of mass, while right-brain-damaged patients were more impaired on movement velocity. The results show specific mechanisms for modulating posture depending on the damaged side. These findings support the idea that each hemisphere contributes differently to static and dynamic postural control.

 

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Suellen Marinho Andrade, Universidade Federal da Paraíba
1Center for Research in Human Movement Sciences, Federal University of Paraíba, Campus I, Castelo Branco, 58051-900, João Pessoa, Brazil.
Bernardino Fernandéz-Calvo, Universidade Federal da Paraíba
2Department of Psychology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.
Publicado
2015-07-01
Como Citar
Andrade, S. M., & Fernandéz-Calvo, B. (2015). <b&gt;Static and dynamic impairment following stroke reflecting hemispheric asymmetry for postural control. Acta Scientiarum. Health Sciences, 37(2), 127-132. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascihealthsci.v37i2.25414
Seção
Ciências da Saúde

0.3
2019CiteScore
 
 
8th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

 

0.3
2019CiteScore
 
 
8th percentile
Powered by  Scopus