A A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON DECISION MAKING   – ILLUSTARTIONS

Supraja s; Naresh Kumar  Padaraju; Surya Prabhavati B.S

doi:10.5269/bspm.80500

Supraja s Associate Professor
Naresh Kumar Padaraju Asst.Prof,,Department of Mathematics, Vignana Bharathi Institute of Technology, Aushapur,Hyderabad, Telangana.
Surya Prabhavati B.S Asst.Prof, Department of Mathematics, Geethanjali College of Engineering and Technology,Cheeryal,Hyderabad,Telangana.

Resumen

Choice making plays a really imperative part in today’s lives. In spite of the fact that the arrangements are procured by applying accessible MCDM (Multi Criteria Decision Making) strategies, arrangements in this way gotten may be steady or inconsistent. T.L. Saaty as of now created a strategy to check the consistency. Despite that, Triantaphyllou recommends that, performing Sensitivity investigation makes strides the consistency of the arrangement. As a result, a strategy of MCDM entitled as RSAWM is presented in this study based on their recommendations.

This paper is totally a comparative consider between two genuine life circumstances. In this think RSAWM (Revised Simple Additive Weighting Method) Strategy is connected to select best choice for two genuine life circumstances: 1. For the choice of best and superior computer framework among the three frameworks (consistent case) and 2. For the choice of a department of understudy for the choice of ALLROUND EXCELLENCE Grant from an Engineering College (inconsistent case).Later, sensitivity examination is connected to check the affectability by altering the weight of the criteria in three diverse cases to confirm the alter within the choice gotten by RSAWM. It is obvious that the choices gotten for the circumstances are steady indeed after affectability investigation is connected.

Key Words: RSAWM, MCDM, consistency, Sensitivity investigation, Choice Making etc…

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.

Citas

[1] Saaty, T. L. (1984). “Inconsistency and rank preservation”, J. Math.Psychol,28(2).
[2] Kousalya, P., Supraja, S. (2013). “A Membership Function Solution Approach to AHP”, Vol.2, No.1, American Jr. of Mathematics and Sciences, ISSN NO:2250-3102, Mind Reader Publications.
[3] Saaty, T.L. (1980). “The Analytical Hierarchy Process”,Tata McGraw Hill, New York.
[4] Saaty, T.L. (1994). “Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the AHP”, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA, U.S.A.
[5] Triantaphyllou, E., & Mann, S.H. (1994). “A computational evaluation of the AHP and the revised AHP when the eigen value method is used under a continuity assumption”,Computers and Industrial Engineering, 26(3), 609-618.
[6] Triantaphyllou, E., Alfonso Sanchez, (1997). “A sensitivity analysis approach for some deterministic multi-criteria decision making methods”, Decision Sciences, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 151-194.
[7] Patric T. Harker, “The art of Science and Decision-making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process’’, Springer Verlag, 1989.
[8] AzizollahMemariani et al. (2009). “Sensitivity analysis of a simple additive weight method: The results of change in the weight of one attribute on the final ranking of the alternatives”, Journal of industrial engineering 4, 13-18.
[9] Triantaphyllou, E., Lootsma, F.A., Pardalos, P.M., & Mann, S.H. (1994). On the evaluation and application of different scales for quantifying pair wise comparisons in fuzzy sets. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 3(3), 133-155.
[10] Supraja, S., Kousalya, P. (2013). On some aspects of sensitivity analysis in AHP –an Illustration, Volume 4, Issue 6, International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research.
[11] S. Supraja, Dr.P.Kousalya, (2020).Sensitivity Analysis through RSAWM – A Case Study In: Dutta D., Mahanty B. (eds) Numerical Optimization in Engineering and Sciences. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 979. Springer(SCOPUS).
[12] S. Supraja, Dr. P. Kousalya,(2020) RSAWM for the selection of All Round Excellence Award – an Illustration. In: Dutta D., Mahanty B. (eds) Numerical Optimization in Engineering and Sciences. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 979. Springer(SCOPUS).