<b>Analysis of the growth of pot chrysanthemum, Puritan cultivar, irrigated under different substrate water tensions in greenhouse</b> - doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v33i1.1763

  • Maryzélia Furtado de Farias Centro de Ciências Agrárias da Universidade Federal do Maranhão
  • João Carlos Cury Saad Universidade Estadual Paulista
Keywords: Dendranthema grandiflora, irrigation scheduling, substrate water tension

Abstract

Irrigation is an important practice in chrysanthemum growing, but water management has been neglected, resulting in quality losses and yield reduction. The experiment was conducted at the Steltenpool farm, in the Holambra II District of the city of Paranapanema (23°4’S and 49°00’W). The aim of this research was to identify the best substrate water tension that could assure quality and high yield for the chrysanthemum, Puritan cultivar. Treatments were composed of six levels of substrate water tension: -2, -3, -4, -6, -10 and -30 kPa. Results showed that -2, -6 and -10 kPa substrate water tension resulted in the highest number of pots with A1 quality, considered the highest level in the grower’s scale. Post-harvest was also evaluated and plants irrigated when substrate water tension reached -30 kPa presented longer durability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Maryzélia Furtado de Farias, Centro de Ciências Agrárias da Universidade Federal do Maranhão
Dra em Agronomia com Area de Concentração em Irrigação e Drenagem
João Carlos Cury Saad, Universidade Estadual Paulista
Departamento de Engenharia Rural e área de concetração em irrigação e drenagem
Published
2011-02-16
How to Cite
Farias, M. F. de, & Saad, J. C. C. (2011). <b>Analysis of the growth of pot chrysanthemum, Puritan cultivar, irrigated under different substrate water tensions in greenhouse</b&gt; - doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v33i1.1763. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 33(1), 75-79. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v33i1.1763
Section
Crop Production

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus