<b>Analysis of the growth of pot chrysanthemum, Puritan cultivar, irrigated under different substrate water tensions in greenhouse</b> - doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v33i1.1763
Keywords:
Dendranthema grandiflora, irrigation scheduling, substrate water tension
Abstract
Irrigation is an important practice in chrysanthemum growing, but water management has been neglected, resulting in quality losses and yield reduction. The experiment was conducted at the Steltenpool farm, in the Holambra II District of the city of Paranapanema (23°4’S and 49°00’W). The aim of this research was to identify the best substrate water tension that could assure quality and high yield for the chrysanthemum, Puritan cultivar. Treatments were composed of six levels of substrate water tension: -2, -3, -4, -6, -10 and -30 kPa. Results showed that -2, -6 and -10 kPa substrate water tension resulted in the highest number of pots with A1 quality, considered the highest level in the grower’s scale. Post-harvest was also evaluated and plants irrigated when substrate water tension reached -30 kPa presented longer durability.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2011-02-16
How to Cite
Farias, M. F. de, & Saad, J. C. C. (2011). <b>Analysis of the growth of pot chrysanthemum, Puritan cultivar, irrigated under different substrate water tensions in greenhouse</b> - doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v33i1.1763. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 33(1), 75-79. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v33i1.1763
Issue
Section
Crop Production
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY AND COPYRIGHTS
I Declare that current article is original and has not been submitted for publication, in part or in whole, to any other national or international journal.
The copyrights belong exclusively to the authors. Published content is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) guidelines, which allows sharing (copy and distribution of the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially, under the terms of attribution.
2.0
2019CiteScore
60th percentile
Powered by 
2.0
2019CiteScore
60th percentile
Powered by 







































