<b>Diurnal ingestive behavior of Holstein calves reared in different systems: feedlot or pasture

  • Luciane Rumpel Segabinazzi Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná
  • Luis Fernando Glasenapp de Menezes Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
  • Carlos Eduardo Kruger da Silva Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná
  • Clederson Martinello Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná
  • Bruna Boito Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná
  • Marcos Luis Molineti Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná
Palavras-chave: ingestive efficiency, idleness, rumination, calves

Resumo

This study evaluated the ingestive behavior of Hostein calves kept in two husbandry systems: feedlot or pasture. We examined the ingestive behavior of 11 male non-castrated calves, with average initial age of 75 days, six of which were individually penned, consuming corn silage and concentrate-based diet at a ratio of 40:60 (on a DM basis), and the remainder, on pearl millet pasture (Pennisetum americanum) receiving concentrate supplementation at 1.0% body weight. Evaluations were held from November to February, from 8:00 am to 6:00 pm. Feedlot calves stay longer (p < 0.05) in idle, both in lying and standing positions, while animals on pasture spent more time in eating and ruminating activities. Confined animals performed a higher number of daily meals, but of shorter duration each. In both production systems, rumination activity is preferably performed in lying position, however, rumination time in standing position is about 1.4 times longer for those kept on pasture. Animals kept on pasture show a lower efficiency of DM intake, greater number of ruminated boluses, which were ruminated for less time and with fewer cud chewings.

 

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.
Publicado
2014-05-08
Como Citar
Segabinazzi, L. R., Menezes, L. F. G. de, Silva, C. E. K. da, Martinello, C., Boito, B., & Molineti, M. L. (2014). <b&gt;Diurnal ingestive behavior of Holstein calves reared in different systems: feedlot or pasture. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences, 36(2), 225-231. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v36i2.22653
Seção
Produção Animal

0.9
2019CiteScore
 
 
29th percentile
Powered by  Scopus