<b>Designing an intelligent system to predict drill wear by using of motor current and fuzzy logic method</b> - doi: 10.4025/actascitechnol.v35i4.15647

Autores

  • Aydin Salimi University of Payam Noor
  • Mohammad Zadshakoyan University of Tabriz
  • Ahmet í–zdemir University of Gazi
  • Esmaeil Seidi University of Payam Noor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4025/actascitechnol.v35i4.15647

Palavras-chave:

tool condition monitoring, current signal, machine tool drives, thrust and cutting forces, drill wea, fuzzy logic

Resumo

In automation flexible manufacturing systems, tool wear detection during the cutting process is one of the most important considerations. This study presents an intelligent system for online tool condition monitoring in drilling process. In this paper, analytical and empirical models have been used to predict the thrust and cutting forces on the lip and chisel edges of a new drill. Also an empirical model is used to estimate tool wear rate and force values on the edges of the worn drill .By using the block diagram of machine tool drives, the changes in the feed and spindle motor currents are simulated, as wear rate increases. To predict tool wear rate, fuzzy logic capabilities have been used to develop an intelligent system. The simulation results presented with MATLAB software show the effectiveness of proposed system for on-line drill wear monitoring. This is confirmed by comparing the measured and estimated values with each other in which the value of R2 was obtained 0.9367 in the regression graph.

 

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Arquivos adicionais

Publicado

2013-05-23

Como Citar

Salimi, A., Zadshakoyan, M., í–zdemir, A., & Seidi, E. (2013). <b>Designing an intelligent system to predict drill wear by using of motor current and fuzzy logic method</b> - doi: 10.4025/actascitechnol.v35i4.15647. Acta Scientiarum. Technology, 35(4), 669–676. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascitechnol.v35i4.15647

Edição

Seção

Engenharia Mecânica

 

0.8
2019CiteScore
 
 
36th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

 

0.8
2019CiteScore
 
 
36th percentile
Powered by  Scopus