Automatic Classification of COVID-19 using CT-Scan Images

Autores

  • Hatice Catal Reis Gumushane University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4025/actascitechnol.v43i1.55189

Palavras-chave:

coronavirus; machine learning; SVM; AdaBoost; NASNetMobile; InceptionV3

Resumo

Medicine and engineering sciences have been working in close contact for common purposes. Machine learning algorithms are used in the medical field for early diagnosis prediction. The major aim of this study is to evaluate machine learning algorithms and deep learning algorithms using computed tomography scan (CT-scan) images for automated detection of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. We obtained seven hundred and fifty-seven (757) CT-scan images from a public platform. We applied four automated traditional classification methods to predict COVID-19 using deep learning and machine learning. These algorithms are SVM, AdaBoost, NASNetMobile, and InceptionV3. Comparative analyses are presented among the four models by considering metric performance factors to find the best model. The results show that the InceptionV3 model achieves better performance in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, Cohen´s kappa, F1- score, root mean squared error (RMSE), and receiver operating characteristic- area under the curve (ROC-AUC), in comparison with the other Covid-19 classifiers. Accordingly, the InceptionV3 approach is recommended for the automatic diagnosis of Covid-19 and assessments. This research can present a second point of view to medical experts and it can save time for researchers as the performance of standard machine learning methods in detecting COVID-19 is evaluated.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Downloads

Publicado

2021-09-23

Como Citar

Catal Reis, H. (2021). Automatic Classification of COVID-19 using CT-Scan Images . Acta Scientiarum. Technology, 43(1), e55189. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascitechnol.v43i1.55189

Edição

Seção

Ciência da Computação

 

0.8
2019CiteScore
 
 
36th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

 

0.8
2019CiteScore
 
 
36th percentile
Powered by  Scopus