Accuracy of goodness-of-fit criteria for nonlinear regression: a study via Monte Carlo simulation

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4025/actascitechnol.v46i1.63428

Palavras-chave:

Growth curves; Coefficient of determination (R^2); Asymptotic Index (AI); Mean Absolute Error (MAE); nonlinearity measures.

Resumo

Nonlinear regression models are widespread in the literature, and one of their main applications is in the study of sigmoidal growth curves. There are several models for this purpose, and the most used are the logistic, Gompertz, von Bertalanffy, and Brody models. Each one of them has its own characteristics and is more suitable for a given curve shape. There are several criteria in the literature for selecting the most appropriate model, but there is no consensus on the best criteria. Thus, the present study aims to evaluate the accuracy of the main selection criteria via Monte Carlo simulation, considering the logistic, Gompertz, von Bertalanffy, and Brody nonlinear regression models. Four simulation scenarios are used, each simulated with ideal curves of the logistic, Gompertz, von Bertalanffy and Brody models. Next, the 4 models are adjusted for each of the scenarios, and the main quality criteria found in the literature are calculated to assess the ability of the criteria to identify the most appropriate model for each scenario. The results show that the criteria asymptotic index, mean absolute error and coefficient of determination choose the correct model more often than the other criteria studied. Although the measures of the Battes and Watts curvature and box bias are important for the evaluation of the goodness-of-fit of the models, they are not indicated for the selection of the best model.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Downloads

Publicado

2024-09-04

Como Citar

Silva, W. da S. e ., Fernandes, F. A. ., Fernandes, T. J. ., & Muniz, J. A. . (2024). Accuracy of goodness-of-fit criteria for nonlinear regression: a study via Monte Carlo simulation . Acta Scientiarum. Technology, 46(1), e63428. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascitechnol.v46i1.63428

Edição

Seção

Estatí­stica

 

0.8
2019CiteScore
 
 
36th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

 

0.8
2019CiteScore
 
 
36th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

Artigos mais lidos pelo mesmo(s) autor(es)