<b><em>Germination of Aechmea nudicaulis</em> (L.) Griseb. (Bromeliaceae) in different substracts as alternatives to <em>Dicksonia sellowiana</em> Hook</b> - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v30i1.1134

  • Adilson Anacleto UFPR
  • Raquel Rejane Bonato Negrelle UFPR
  • Henrique Soares Koehler UFPR

Abstract

For this study, the germination of Aechmea nudicaulis (L.) Griseb. (Bromeliaceae) was evaluated. Production attempts from seeds for this species have taken place in an empirical form, using substrate based on xaxim (Dicksonia sellowiana Hook.) powder, the use of which is currently restricted, as it is an endangered species. Five easily accessible alternative substratum were tested: worm humus, sand, coconut shell fiber, forest litter, and Plantmax®. The experiment was conducted using a completely randomized design, with four replications and 50 seeds per experimental unit, at room temperature in a rustic nursery covered with 70% shade cloth. Weekly readings were performed during 70 days. The best alternative as a substitute to xaxim was forest litter, due to its germinability of 79.5% and survival rates of 97%, significantly similar to xaxim (78%; 94.75%; Tukey p < 0,05). Additionally, this product features positive characteristics such as high availability, low cost, and easy recycling

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Adilson Anacleto, UFPR
Bacharel em Administração pela Faculdade Estadual de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Paranaguá, mestrado em Ciências (Agronomia - Produção Vegetal) pela Universidade Federal do Paraná (2005). Atualmente é professor na Faculdade do Litoral Paranaense Currículo Lattes
Published
2008-03-18
How to Cite
Anacleto, A., Negrelle, R. R. B., & Koehler, H. S. (2008). <b><em>Germination of Aechmea nudicaulis</em> (L.) Griseb. (Bromeliaceae) in different substracts as alternatives to <em>Dicksonia sellowiana</em> Hook</b&gt; - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v30i1.1134. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 30(1), 73-79. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v30i1.1134
Section
Crop Production

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus