<b>Rank-ordering coefficients of variation for popping expansion</b> - doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v33i3.11911
Keywords:
Zea mays, dispersion measurement, genetic improvement, precision, accuracy
Abstract
The coefficient of variation (CV) has been the most important statistic to determine the precision of experimental errors, but an even classification for guiding popcorn breeders is still lacking for popping expansion. The normality of data from 50 CVs was tested through the Shapiro-Wilk test, and the mean (m), median, standard deviation (SD), maximum and minimum values, asymmetry and kurtosis were all determined using the momentum method. The CVs were ranked as low [CV ≤ (m - 1 SD)], moderate [(m - 1 SD) < CV ≤ (m + 1 SD)], high [(m + 1 SD) < CV ≤ (m + 2 SD)] and very high [CV > (m + 2 SD)]. In summary, these data were close to the normality because the slight and flattened curve was skewed to the right. The CV’s mean was 11.08, the median was 11.94 and the standard deviation was 5.13%. Accordingly, values of CV ≤ 5.95% are low, 5.95 < CV ≤ 15.21% are moderate, 15.21 < CV ≤ 20.34% are high, and CV > 20.34% are very high.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2011-04-11
How to Cite
Arnhold, E., & Milani, K. F. (2011). <b>Rank-ordering coefficients of variation for popping expansion</b> - doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v33i3.11911. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 33(3), 527-531. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v33i3.11911
Issue
Section
Crop Production
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY AND COPYRIGHTS
I Declare that current article is original and has not been submitted for publication, in part or in whole, to any other national or international journal.
The copyrights belong exclusively to the authors. Published content is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) guidelines, which allows sharing (copy and distribution of the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially, under the terms of attribution.
2.0
2019CiteScore
60th percentile
Powered by 
2.0
2019CiteScore
60th percentile
Powered by 