<b>Instrumental improvement for assessment of plant water uptake through sap flux monitoring</b> - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v27i4.1692
Abstract
Crop water monitoring is important for a detailed irrigation control. It is desirable to develop reliable and portable techniques to properly assess the water uptake of agricultural crops. An experiment was conducted in the IAC/Jundiaí, state of São Paulo aiming to achieve such developments. An integrated system based on heat pulse technique was designed and built in order to assess water uptake. Different probe configurations were tested, aiming to find the best sensor profile for field usage. Field and laboratory grown maize were used to calibrate the system. Testing the system on maize stems resulted in a coherent relationship between heat transport and sap flux, for two of the sensor configurations tested. Field results of water uptake determination, obtained comparatively with standard methodology, agreed with the daily-paired data and yielded reasonable values based on statistical Willmot index.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2008-04-07
How to Cite
Santos, A. O., Bigas-Adão, F. M. R., Barros, C. de, & Hernandez, J. L. (2008). <b>Instrumental improvement for assessment of plant water uptake through sap flux monitoring</b> - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v27i4.1692. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 27(4), 687-695. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v27i4.1692
Issue
Section
Engineering
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY AND COPYRIGHTS
I Declare that current article is original and has not been submitted for publication, in part or in whole, to any other national or international journal.
The copyrights belong exclusively to the authors. Published content is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) guidelines, which allows sharing (copy and distribution of the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially, under the terms of attribution.
2.0
2019CiteScore
60th percentile
Powered by 
2.0
2019CiteScore
60th percentile
Powered by 







































