<b>Cooking capacity of common bean grains from <em>ESAL 693 x Rosinha</em> cross families</b> - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v27i2.1707
Abstract
The aim of this work was to identify the cooking capacity of grains from 23 common bean families already selected for high grain yield and grain type. They were derived from ESAL 693 x Rosinha cross and are all precocious, of type-I growth habit. The family seeds were from F2:6/F4:6 generation (eight months old) and F2:7/F4:7 (one month old); cooking and water absorption ability were evaluated using 25 seeds per plot, with two replications, through a JAB-77 experimental cooker, minor type. Cooking capacity and water absorption of the grains from the 23 families were genetically different and showed the same performance for both ages. Four families (1, 13, 14 and 15) presented high cooking capacity for both ages, among which 13, 14 and 15 distinguished for having high heritability estimates, making them the best choice for selection. No correlation was observed between the two traits, indicating that cooking capacity is the factor that should be evaluated for selection.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2008-04-07
How to Cite
Baldoni, A. B., & Santos, J. B. dos. (2008). <b>Cooking capacity of common bean grains from <em>ESAL 693 x Rosinha</em> cross families</b> - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v27i2.1707. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 27(2), 233-236. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v27i2.1707
Issue
Section
Crop Production
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY AND COPYRIGHTS
I Declare that current article is original and has not been submitted for publication, in part or in whole, to any other national or international journal.
The copyrights belong exclusively to the authors. Published content is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) guidelines, which allows sharing (copy and distribution of the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially, under the terms of attribution.
2.0
2019CiteScore
60th percentile
Powered by 
2.0
2019CiteScore
60th percentile
Powered by 







































