<b>Stand evaluation for AF845 and AF750 carrot hybrids</b> - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v26i2.1871

  • Walter Fernando Bernardi USP
  • Joelson André de Freitas Sakata Seed Sedamérica
  • Vagner Aparecido Ramos da Silva Sakata Seed Sedamérica
  • Augusto Tulmann Neto USP

Abstract

Two randomized complet block design experiments were carried out whit five treatments (stands), six replications and 1.7m2 per plot, at the Bragança Paulista Research Station - Sakata. It was done to know the better growing stand for germoplasm selection. AF 845 and AF 750 carrot F1 hybrids, were used for the respective following traits: 1(50, 60, 70, 90 and 110 plants/m2) and 2 (70, 90, 110, 130 and 150 plants/m2). For both experiments, a set of twenty-six plant characteristcs, yield and root qulity characteristics were evaluated. The characteristics plant vigor, root percentages (1 to 14cm and larger than 23cm), and refuese of roots, presented significante differences in the trial with AF845 hybrid. In the other trial (AF750), nine characteristics presentade significante differences. The results of this work showed that 90 and 110 plants/m2 were the better stands for AF845 and AF750, respectively

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Walter Fernando Bernardi, USP
Possui graduação em Engenharia Agronômica pela Universidade de São Paulo (2002). Atualmente é pesquisador (doutorando) da Universidade de São Paulo, ESALQ, na área de Genética e Melhoramento de Plantas. Tem experiência na área de Agronomia, com ênfase em Agronomia, atuando principalmente nos seguintes temas: micropropagação, biotecnologia, glycine max, musa spp., podridão vermelha das raízes, Fusarium solani f.sp. glycines e seleção de cultivares Currículo Lattes
Published
2008-04-11
How to Cite
Bernardi, W. F., Freitas, J. A. de, Silva, V. A. R. da, & Tulmann Neto, A. (2008). <b>Stand evaluation for AF845 and AF750 carrot hybrids</b&gt; - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v26i2.1871. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 26(2), 125-130. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v26i2.1871
Section
Agronomy

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus