<b>Ultrastructural and cytochemical analysis of physic nut callus tissue in response to different combinations of growth regulators

  • Dalilhia Nazaré dos Santos Universidade Federal de Lavras
  • Claudinéia Ferreira Nunes Universidade Federal de Lavras
  • Joyce Dória Rodrigues Soares Universidade Federal de Lavras
  • Eduardo Alves Universidade Federal de Lavras
  • Cláudia Regina Contijo Labory Universidade Federal de Lavras
  • Moacir Pasqual Universidade Federal de Lavras
  • Leila Aparecida Salles Pio Universidade Federal de Lavras
Keywords: Jatropha curcas L., embryogenesis, microscopy, cytochemistry

Abstract

This study aimed to induce callus formation in Jatropha curcas L. and to evaluate the ultrastructure and cytochemical behavior of the calli. Calluses were induced with 2,4-D, picloram-PIC, kinetin (Kin) and BAP: (1) control; (2) 4.52 µM 2,4-D; (3) 9.04 µM 2,4-D; (4) 4.14 µM PIC; (5) 8.28 µM PIC; (6) 4.52 µM 2,4-D + 2.32 µM KIN; (7) 9.04 µM 2,4-D + 4.64 µM KIN; (8) 4.14 µM PIC + 2.32 µM KIN; (9) 8.28 µM PIC + 4.64 µM KIN; (10) 4.52 µM 2,4-D + 2.22 µM BAP; (11) 9.04 µM 2,4-D + 4.44 µM BAP; (12) 4.14 µM PIC + 2.22 µM BAP and (13) 8.28 µM PIC + 4.44 µM BAP. It was evaluated the percent coverage of the explants by callus (% CEC) and performed scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and acetocarmine/Evans blue double staining to analyze the embryogenic potential of the calli. As shown by scanning electron microscopy and acetocarmine/Evans blue staining, we found that J. curcas callus formation was optimal with 4.52 µM of 2,4-D.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2015-08-03
How to Cite
Santos, D. N. dos, Nunes, C. F., Soares, J. D. R., Alves, E., Labory, C. R. C., Pasqual, M., & Pio, L. A. S. (2015). <b&gt;Ultrastructural and cytochemical analysis of physic nut callus tissue in response to different combinations of growth regulators. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 37(3), 355-359. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v37i3.19745
Section
Crop Production

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus