Growth, parthenolide and proline contents in <em>Tanacetum parthenium</em> (L. ) Schultz Bip

  • Luciana Marques de Carvalho EMPBRAPA
  • Vicente Wagner Dias Casali UFV
  • Márcio A. de Souza UFV
  • Luiz Cláudio de Almeida Barbosa UFV
  • Paulo Roberto Cecon UFV

Abstract

In substratum of different humidity contents. Aiming at determining the effect of soil's water levels on the parthenolide contents of plants aerial parts, this experiment used feverfew [Tanacetum parthenium (L. ) Schultz Bip. ], grown in 5-L vases, with substratum kept at 100%, 90%, 70% and 50% field capacity. In the substratum highest water availability levels, plants showed larger height, more leaves, higher total leaf area and higher parthenolide content. In the lowest water availability level, the following decreases were verified: 16% in plants height, 13% in number of leaves, 14% in leaf area and 28% in parthenolide content, and an increase in the proline content. This suggests that higher water levels in soil are more appropriate for producing plants with larger parthenolide content.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Vicente Wagner Dias Casali, UFV
Possui graduação em Agronomia pela Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (1966) , mestrado em Fitotecnia (Produção Vegetal) pela Universidade Federal de Viçosa (1970) e doutorado em Genética e Melhoramento pela Purdue University (1973) . Atualmente é PROFESSOR TITULAR da Universidade Federal de Viçosa e professor titular da Universidade Federal de Viçosa. Tem experiência na área de Agronomia , com ênfase em Fitotecnia. Atuando principalmente nos seguintes temas: Breeding Methods, Generation Advance, Selection, SSD Currículo Lattes
Published
2008-04-11
How to Cite
Carvalho, L. M. de, Casali, V. W. D., Souza, M. A. de, Barbosa, L. C. de A., & Cecon, P. R. (2008). Growth, parthenolide and proline contents in <em>Tanacetum parthenium</em&gt; (L. ) Schultz Bip. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 27(1), 151-157. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v27i1.2137
Section
Crop Production

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus