Energetic demand requested by seeder for no-tillage, submitted to three operation speed

  • Claudio Graciano Trintin UEM
  • Raimundo Pinheiro Neto Universidade Estadual de Maringá
  • Virindiana Colet Bortolotto UEM

Abstract

This work aimed to evaluate the energetic demand requested by a seeder for no-tillage, submitted to three forward speeds in Haplotox Soil. The experiment had a completely random design, with three treatments (T1 = group tractor/seeder operating the speed of 4.2 km h-1; T2 = 5.2 km h-1 and T3 = 6.5 km h-1) and four replications. A 4 x 2 (TDA) tractor and a 9-line seeder (soybean) were used. The parameters evaluated were: motor rotation, medium and maximum draw bar pull, wheel drive slip, hourly consumption fuel, medium and maximum power and operational capacity. Speed effects were not observed for medium and maximum draw bar pull and for wheel drive slip. As expected, such effects were observed only for hourly consumption fuel, power (medium and maximum) and operational capacity. The data obtained showed that the tractor was overmeasured for the operation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Raimundo Pinheiro Neto, Universidade Estadual de Maringá
possui graduação em Engenharia Agrícola pela Universidade Federal da Paraíba (1981) , mestrado em Engenharia Mecânica [C. Grande] pela Universidade Federal da Paraíba (1986) e doutorado em Agronomia (Energia na Agricultura) pela Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (1999) . Atualmente é Professor não-titular da Universidade Estadual de Maringá. Tem experiência na área de Engenharia Agrícola , com ênfase em Máquinas e Implementos Agrícolas
Published
2008-04-11
How to Cite
Trintin, C. G., Pinheiro Neto, R., & Bortolotto, V. C. (2008). Energetic demand requested by seeder for no-tillage, submitted to three operation speed. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 27(1), 127-131. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v27i1.2155
Section
Agricultural Engineering

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus