Analysis of growth and efficiency of water use by soybeans, beans and weeds
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of uptake and use of water by cultures of soybeans, Glycine max, Glycine max (L.) Merril, beans, Phaseolus vulgaris L. and the weed species Euphorbia heterophylla (resistant and susceptible to ALS enzyme inhibiting herbicides), Bidens pilosa and Desmodium tortuosum, as well as to evaluate the routing of photoassimilates and the length of their cycles. None of the weed species evaluated completed a cycle before the bean harvest, which was the plant that used the water furnished at the beginning of the cycle most efficiently. B. pilosa was the species that directed the greatest proportion of photoassimilates into root formation during the vegetative phase. Soybeans presented the highest daily biomass accumulation rates and highest water use efficiency during the whole cycle. D. tortuosum was the most efficient weed species in capturing and using water in the vegetative phase, whereas B. pilosa was after flowering. E. heterophylla biotypes were competitively equivalentDownloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2008-04-30
How to Cite
Procopio, S. de O., dos Santos, J. B., da Silva, A. A., & Costa, L. C. (2008). Analysis of growth and efficiency of water use by soybeans, beans and weeds. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 24, 1345-1351. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v24i0.2379
Issue
Section
Agronomy
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY AND COPYRIGHTS
I Declare that current article is original and has not been submitted for publication, in part or in whole, to any other national or international journal.
The copyrights belong exclusively to the authors. Published content is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) guidelines, which allows sharing (copy and distribution of the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially, under the terms of attribution.
2.0
2019CiteScore
60th percentile
Powered by 
2.0
2019CiteScore
60th percentile
Powered by 