Assessment of <em>Eucalyptus</em> species and provenances for planting in the northwestern Paraná
Abstract
Reforestation to cope with growing demand of wood and to minimize the pressure in remnant natural forests is extremely important. Twelve species from different sites were planted in 49 plots in 3 m x 2 m spacing in randomized complete blocks design with four replications, on the Tamanduá Experimental Farm in Campo Mourão to identify the most productive species of Eucalyptus (Myrtaceae) and their provenance, in the Campo Mourão region, state of Paraná, Brazil, Stem diameter at breast height and total tree height were measured and survival percentages were recorded at the age of seven years. Stem volume was estimated by using a 0.5 form factor. E. grandis from Mogi Guaçu grew fastest and produced the highest wood volume, while E. nitens, E. paniculata, E. camaldulensis from Brasilândia and E. pellita 10.966 exhibited the lowest production. E. “cambiju”, E. robusta, E. camaldulensis 12.186, E. citriodora from Acesita seed production area, and E. maculata 11.249 had intermediate yieldsDownloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2008-05-09
How to Cite
Quiqui, E. M. D., Martins, S. S., & Shimizu, J. Y. (2008). Assessment of <em>Eucalyptus</em> species and provenances for planting in the northwestern Paraná. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 23, 1173-1177. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v23i0.2571
Issue
Section
Agronomy
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY AND COPYRIGHTS
I Declare that current article is original and has not been submitted for publication, in part or in whole, to any other national or international journal.
The copyrights belong exclusively to the authors. Published content is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) guidelines, which allows sharing (copy and distribution of the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially, under the terms of attribution.
2.0
2019CiteScore
60th percentile
Powered by 
2.0
2019CiteScore
60th percentile
Powered by 