<b>Semi-decomposed chicken manure on Chinês and Macaquinho taro yield</b> - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v25i1.2609
Abstract
Chinês and Macaquinho taros and doses of 0; 7; 14; 21 and 28 t ha-1 of semi decomposed chicken manure - CFC were studied, aiming to know the fresh mass plants yield, in Dourados, state of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil, in a Dystrorthox soil, arranged as 2 x 5 factorial scheme in a randomized complete block design with four replications. The harvest was done 225 days after the sowing. Average yields of leaf fresh masses were not influenced by clones/CFC doses interaction, they did not vary among clones, and were neither influenced by doses of CFC incorporated into the soil. Corm (RM) production of Macaquinho clone (4.56 t ha-1) was 65.2% higher than Chinês (2.76 t ha-1). There was an increase of RM yield, varying from 22.6% (14 t ha-1) to 72.3% (28 t ha-1), with the CFC use in relation to treatment with 0 t ha-1. Large and medium cormels (RF) production of Macaquinho and Chinês corresponded to 89.9% and 84.6%, respectively, of total production of RF.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2008-04-23
How to Cite
Zárate, N. A. H., Vieira, M. do C., Rosa Jr, E. J., & Alves, J. C. (2008). <b>Semi-decomposed chicken manure on Chinês and Macaquinho taro yield</b> - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v25i1.2609. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 25(1), 177-181. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v25i1.2609
Issue
Section
Agronomy
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY AND COPYRIGHTS
I Declare that current article is original and has not been submitted for publication, in part or in whole, to any other national or international journal.
The copyrights belong exclusively to the authors. Published content is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) guidelines, which allows sharing (copy and distribution of the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially, under the terms of attribution.
2.0
2019CiteScore
60th percentile
Powered by 
2.0
2019CiteScore
60th percentile
Powered by 