<b>Fertility attributes sampling and variability in a latosol under notillage in <em>São Miguel do Iguaçu</em>, state of <em>Paraná</em></b> - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v25i1.2679
Abstract
The amount of subsamples was determined in the line and interlineations to form a composed sample after the soy crop, under no-tillage for 9 years, in an oxisol red Latosol, loamy texture, in São Miguel do Iguaçu, state of Paraná, Brazil. The collection instrument was the screw auger and the subsamples depth was of 0-15 cm. Considering a 90% variability and a 10% mean error, the results evidenced that: a) the variability in fertility attributes was low for pH, H+Al, Ca and Mg, on the average for K, MO, Fe and Cu and high for P, Zn and Mn; b) 20 subsamples in the line and 13 subsamples in the interlineation were necessary to represent the fertility parameters and nutrients excluding P and Mn; c) soil samples collected with screw auger make the variability high in results due to the smaller soil quantity, requiring a greater number of subsamples.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2008-04-23
How to Cite
Silva, M. A. G. da, Muniz, A. S., Mata, J. de D. V. da, Carissimi, C., & Cegana, A. C. (2008). <b>Fertility attributes sampling and variability in a latosol under notillage in <em>São Miguel do Iguaçu</em>, state of <em>Paraná</em></b> - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v25i1.2679. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 25(1), 243-248. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v25i1.2679
Issue
Section
Agronomy
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY AND COPYRIGHTS
I Declare that current article is original and has not been submitted for publication, in part or in whole, to any other national or international journal.
The copyrights belong exclusively to the authors. Published content is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) guidelines, which allows sharing (copy and distribution of the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially, under the terms of attribution.
2.0
2019CiteScore
60th percentile
Powered by 
2.0
2019CiteScore
60th percentile
Powered by 