<b>Fertility attributes sampling and variability in a latosol under notillage in <em>São Miguel do Iguaçu</em>, state of <em>Paraná</em></b> - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v25i1.2679

  • Maria Anita Gonçalves da Silva UEM - Maringá
  • Antonio Saraiva Muniz UEM
  • José de Deus Viana da Mata UEM
  • Calvino Carissimi UEM
  • Antonio Cristiano Cegana UEM

Abstract

The amount of subsamples was determined in the line and interlineations to form a composed sample after the soy crop, under no-tillage for 9 years, in an oxisol red Latosol, loamy texture, in São Miguel do Iguaçu, state of Paraná, Brazil. The collection instrument was the screw auger and the subsamples depth was of 0-15 cm. Considering a 90% variability and a 10% mean error, the results evidenced that: a) the variability in fertility attributes was low for pH, H+Al, Ca and Mg, on the average for K, MO, Fe and Cu and high for P, Zn and Mn; b) 20 subsamples in the line and 13 subsamples in the interlineation were necessary to represent the fertility parameters and nutrients excluding P and Mn; c) soil samples collected with screw auger make the variability high in results due to the smaller soil quantity, requiring a greater number of subsamples.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Maria Anita Gonçalves da Silva, UEM - Maringá
Atualmente é PROFESSOR ADJUNTO C do Departamento de Agronomia. Tem experiência na área de Agronomia , com ênfase em Ciência do Solo. Atuando principalmente nos seguintes temas: Nitrogênio Potássio Nutrição Capsicum Ambiente Pr. Currículo Lattes
Published
2008-04-23
How to Cite
Silva, M. A. G. da, Muniz, A. S., Mata, J. de D. V. da, Carissimi, C., & Cegana, A. C. (2008). <b>Fertility attributes sampling and variability in a latosol under notillage in <em>São Miguel do Iguaçu</em>, state of <em>Paraná</em></b&gt; - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v25i1.2679. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 25(1), 243-248. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v25i1.2679
Section
Agronomy

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus