<b>Hydric supply of upland rice crop at distinct sowing seasons in Northwestern São Paulo</b> - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v29i2.268

  • Fernando Miqueletti Unesp Ilha Solteira
  • Ricardo Antônio Ferreira Rodrigues Unesp Ilha Solteira
  • Orivaldo Arf UNESP Ilha Solteira

Abstract

The objective of this research was to estimate the probability of the rainfall supplying the hydric demand of rice considering thirteen 5-day-interval. The probability of hydric supply was determined using a function with gama reduced distribution. The means of the maximum, minimum and average of hydric supply detected were: initial phase, maximum of 35 ± 7%; minimum of 0 ± 4% and average of 16 ± 5%; vegetative phase, 34 ± 10%; 2 ± 2% and 11 ± 5%; in the reproductive phase, 21 ± 4%; 0 ± 1% and 8 ± 2%, maturation phase, 34 ± 4%; 1 ± 5% and 16 ± 3%. With sowing simulations occurring in between the first 5-day-interval of September to November, the hydric supply observed was low.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Orivaldo Arf, UNESP Ilha Solteira
possui graduação em Agronomia pela Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (1981), mestrado em Agronomia (Produção Vegetal) pela Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (1986) e doutorado em Agronomia (Produção Vegetal) pela Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (1989). Atualmente é professor titular da Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho. Tem experiência na área de Agronomia, com ênfase em Manejo e Tratos Culturais, atuando principalmente nas seguintes culturas: arroz, feijão, milho e trigo Currículo Lattes
Published
2007-11-01
How to Cite
Miqueletti, F., Rodrigues, R. A. F., & Arf, O. (2007). <b>Hydric supply of upland rice crop at distinct sowing seasons in Northwestern São Paulo</b&gt; - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v29i2.268. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 29(2), 257-262. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v29i2.268
Section
Crop Production

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus