<b>Methods for caterpillars’ control in the culture of tomato</b> - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v29i3.278
Abstract
Five methods for the control of caterpillars, which attack the culture of tomato, were analyzed: the conventional method of application of phytosanitary products; the integrated pest management (IPM); the IPM with the use of Azadirachta indica. extract at 5% (Neem); the sacking of the tomato fruit immediately after flowering, and the control plants (without any treatment against pest). The methods that used phytosanitary products (conventional and IPM) efficiently controlled the caterpillars on the tomato plants and, as a consequence, promoted an increase in the productivity of the culture of 156 and 165% respectively, if compared with the control plants. The number of pulverizations had a reduction of 66.7% when the IPM was used compared to the conventional. The performance of the IPMNeem treatment was significantly the same as the control, denoting poor efficiency in controlling the borer caterpillars. The method of sacking the tomato fruit consisted of a promising alternative in the production without the presence of insecticides.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2007-11-14
How to Cite
Lebedenco, A., Auad, A. M., & Kronka, S. do N. (2007). <b>Methods for caterpillars’ control in the culture of tomato</b> - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v29i3.278. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 29(3), 339-344. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v29i3.278
Issue
Section
Crop Protection
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY AND COPYRIGHTS
I Declare that current article is original and has not been submitted for publication, in part or in whole, to any other national or international journal.
The copyrights belong exclusively to the authors. Published content is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) guidelines, which allows sharing (copy and distribution of the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially, under the terms of attribution.
2.0
2019CiteScore
60th percentile
Powered by 
2.0
2019CiteScore
60th percentile
Powered by 