<b>Methods for caterpillars’ control in the culture of tomato</b> - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v29i3.278

  • Anatoli Lebedenco UNOESTE
  • Alexander Machado Auad EMBRAPA gado de leite
  • Sérgio do Nascimento Kronka UNOESTE

Abstract

Five methods for the control of caterpillars, which attack the culture of tomato, were analyzed: the conventional method of application of phytosanitary products; the integrated pest management (IPM); the IPM with the use of Azadirachta indica. extract at 5% (Neem); the sacking of the tomato fruit immediately after flowering, and the control plants (without any treatment against pest). The methods that used phytosanitary products (conventional and IPM) efficiently controlled the caterpillars on the tomato plants and, as a consequence, promoted an increase in the productivity of the culture of 156 and 165% respectively, if compared with the control plants. The number of pulverizations had a reduction of 66.7% when the IPM was used compared to the conventional. The performance of the IPMNeem treatment was significantly the same as the control, denoting poor efficiency in controlling the borer caterpillars. The method of sacking the tomato fruit consisted of a promising alternative in the production without the presence of insecticides.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Anatoli Lebedenco, UNOESTE
Possui graduação em Agronomia pela Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (1967) e especialização em Proteção de Plantas pela Universidade Federal de Viçosa (2000) . Atualmente é professor titular da Universidade do Oeste Paulista. Atuando principalmente nos seguintes temas: Resistência-Herbicidas-Plantas Daninhas Currículo Lattes
Published
2007-11-14
How to Cite
Lebedenco, A., Auad, A. M., & Kronka, S. do N. (2007). <b>Methods for caterpillars’ control in the culture of tomato</b&gt; - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v29i3.278. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 29(3), 339-344. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v29i3.278
Section
Crop Protection

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus