Selection of tomato plant resistant to arthropod pests mediated by zingiberene

  • Joelson Andre de Freitas EPAMIG
  • Wilson Roberto Maluf UFLA
  • Maria das Graças Cardoso UFLA
  • Ana Cláudia Barneche de Oliveira UFLA

Abstract

The F1 (Lycopersicon esculentum ‘Tom - 556’ x L. hirsutum var. hirsutum ‘PI - 127826’) and F2 populations were obtained seeking to select in this last plants with high zingiberene contents, as indirect selection criterion to arthropod-pests-resistant plants. P1 ‘Tom - 556’ (45), P2 ‘PI - 127826’ (50), F1 (50) and F2 (295) population plants were evaluated at 50 days of life. During five days, three quantifications in each plant were made by extraction of 4.21cm2 of tomato plant leaflets in 2mL of hexane stirred for 40 seconds and quantified in spectrophotometer at 270 nm. The absorbency (Abs) average of zingiberene contents was obtained for individual and population plants and four F2 genotypes with high zingiberene contents were selected (BPX - 368  179, Abs = 0,775; BPX - 368 ≠ 105, Abs = 0,649; BPX - 368 ≠ 250, Abs = 0,623; BPX - 368 ≠ 92, Abs = 0,605). The efficiency of plant selections with high zingiberene contents as an indirect selection criterion to arthropod pests tomato plants resistance was confirmed

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Joelson Andre de Freitas, EPAMIG
possui graduação em Engenharia Agronômica pela Universidade Federal de Lavras (1994) , mestrado em Agronomia (Genética e Melhoramento de Plantas) pela Universidade Federal de Lavras (1996) e doutorado em Agronomia (Genética e Melhoramento de Plantas) pela Universidade Federal de Lavras (1999) . Atualmente é Coordenador de Melhoramento de Hortalicas da Sakata Seed Sudamerica Ltda Currículo Lattes
Published
2008-05-08
How to Cite
Freitas, J. A. de, Maluf, W. R., Cardoso, M. das G., & Oliveira, A. C. B. de. (2008). Selection of tomato plant resistant to arthropod pests mediated by zingiberene. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 22, 919-923. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v22i0.2819
Section
Agronomy

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus