Selection of tomato plant resistant to arthropod pests mediated by zingiberene
Abstract
The F1 (Lycopersicon esculentum ‘Tom - 556’ x L. hirsutum var. hirsutum ‘PI - 127826’) and F2 populations were obtained seeking to select in this last plants with high zingiberene contents, as indirect selection criterion to arthropod-pests-resistant plants. P1 ‘Tom - 556’ (45), P2 ‘PI - 127826’ (50), F1 (50) and F2 (295) population plants were evaluated at 50 days of life. During five days, three quantifications in each plant were made by extraction of 4.21cm2 of tomato plant leaflets in 2mL of hexane stirred for 40 seconds and quantified in spectrophotometer at 270 nm. The absorbency (Abs) average of zingiberene contents was obtained for individual and population plants and four F2 genotypes with high zingiberene contents were selected (BPX - 368 179, Abs = 0,775; BPX - 368 ≠ 105, Abs = 0,649; BPX - 368 ≠ 250, Abs = 0,623; BPX - 368 ≠ 92, Abs = 0,605). The efficiency of plant selections with high zingiberene contents as an indirect selection criterion to arthropod pests tomato plants resistance was confirmedDownloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2008-05-08
How to Cite
Freitas, J. A. de, Maluf, W. R., Cardoso, M. das G., & Oliveira, A. C. B. de. (2008). Selection of tomato plant resistant to arthropod pests mediated by zingiberene. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 22, 919-923. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v22i0.2819
Issue
Section
Agronomy
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY AND COPYRIGHTS
I Declare that current article is original and has not been submitted for publication, in part or in whole, to any other national or international journal.
The copyrights belong exclusively to the authors. Published content is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) guidelines, which allows sharing (copy and distribution of the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially, under the terms of attribution.
2.0
2019CiteScore
60th percentile
Powered by 
2.0
2019CiteScore
60th percentile
Powered by 