Influence of cultural treatments in weed control and cassava productivity cultivated under no-tillage system

  • Antonio Gabriel Filho UNIOESTE
  • Antonio Carlos dos Santos Pessoa UNIOESTE
  • Laércio Stohhaecker UNIOESTE

Abstract

Cassava cultivation is traditionally done with conventional soil preparation. Other techniques such as no-tillage and minimum tillage are currently being adopted. Differences in weed development have been recorded with conventional tillage as compared to that with no-tillage. Manual and mechanical treatments accomplished 30 and 60 days after planting of cassava cultivated under conventional no-tillage are evaluated. Data on yield, effort in manual harvesting and starch concentration were collected. Results indicated that, in the absence of weeds, yield (25759 kg ha-1) was not statistically different from that obtained with manual weeding 60 days after planting (20952 kg ha-1). Manual or mechanical weeding 30 days after planting did not yield satisfactory. On the contrary, it increased cropping labor and decreased root starch concentration due to weed competition

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Antonio Gabriel Filho, UNIOESTE
Possui graduação em Engenharia Agronômica (1989), mestrado em Agronomia (Energia na Agricultura - 1993) e doutorado também em Agronomia (Energia na Agricultura - 1998) pela Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (1998) . Atualmente é professor adjunto da Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná e realiza o pós-doutorado da Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho. Tem experiência na área de Agronomia, com ênfase em Mecanização Agrícola, atuando principalmente nos seguintes temas: mecanização, máquinas agrícola e compactação do solo Currículo Lattes
Published
2008-05-08
How to Cite
Filho, A. G., Pessoa, A. C. dos S., & Stohhaecker, L. (2008). Influence of cultural treatments in weed control and cassava productivity cultivated under no-tillage system. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 22, 1005-1009. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v22i0.2854
Section
Agronomy

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus