Optimization of a gravity-operated limestone distribution equipment
Abstract
Changes in the mechanism of the IMASA limestone distribuition equipment are provided. (The modified equipment has been called optimized machine or optimized distributor). A conventional limestone distribuition equipment has been used as a source of standard data for analyzing and comparing the efficiency of conventional and optimized machines. Field experimentations have been performed in twelve strips of land (3 by 50 meters) by both machines, loaded with 750, 1500 and 3000 kg of limestone, respectively. Limestone distributed by machines have been collected into numbered containers and weighed. A mathematical model based on the factorial variance analysis has been adopted as the statistical basis for treating current research data. Major parameters comprise machines and load levels, as first and second factors, respectively. Optimized limestone distribution equipment exhibited a better uniformity of distribution and quantity closer to specifications when compared with conventional equipment for the load levels currently investigatedDownloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2008-05-08
How to Cite
Pinheiro Neto, R., Oliveira, N. V. de, & Cabeleiro, F. C. C. (2008). Optimization of a gravity-operated limestone distribution equipment. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 22, 1065-1068. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v22i0.2869
Issue
Section
Agronomy
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY AND COPYRIGHTS
I Declare that current article is original and has not been submitted for publication, in part or in whole, to any other national or international journal.
The copyrights belong exclusively to the authors. Published content is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) guidelines, which allows sharing (copy and distribution of the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially, under the terms of attribution.
2.0
2019CiteScore
60th percentile
Powered by 
2.0
2019CiteScore
60th percentile
Powered by 