<b>Influence of the substrate on the growth of cupuassu (Theobroma grandiflorum Schum.) seedlings</b> - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v31i4.3092

  • Maria das Graças Rodrigues Ferreira EMBRAPA
  • Rodrigo Barros Rocha EMBRAPA
  • Edilma Pereira Gonçalves UFRPE
  • Edna Ursulino Alves UFPB
  • George Duarte Ribeiro EMBRAPA
Keywords: native fruit, seeds, germination

Abstract

The cupuassu (Theobroma grandiflorum) stands out as an important recently domesticated Amazon fruit. Although the substrate is a prime factor for plantlet development, there are few recommendations for cupuassu plantlet production. The objective of this work was to evaluate the influence of different substrates on cupuassu germination and seedling growth. Seven substrates were tested in greenhouse conditions: vegetable soil + sand (1:1), vegetable soil, bioplant®, bioclone®, plugmix®, sand and vermiculite. The following germination and seedling traits were evaluated: germination speed index, length and dry mass of roots and aerial parts; using a completely randomized design, with seven treatments and four replications of fifteen seeds. The individual averages were compared by the Scott-Knott test and the substrate recommendation was done using canonical variables. Bioclone® was the substrate that most positively influenced the seedlings development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Rodrigo Barros Rocha, EMBRAPA
Atualmente é pesquisador da Embrapa Rondônia, envolvido principalmente em pesquisas com os seguintes temas : melhoramento de plantas, estatística experimental, uso de marcadores moleculares no melhoramento. Currículo Lattes
Published
2009-08-28
How to Cite
Ferreira, M. das G. R., Rocha, R. B., Gonçalves, E. P., Alves, E. U., & Ribeiro, G. D. (2009). <b>Influence of the substrate on the growth of cupuassu (Theobroma grandiflorum Schum.) seedlings</b&gt; - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v31i4.3092. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 31(4), 677-681. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v31i4.3092
Section
Crop Production

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus