<strong>Growth of micropropagated cavendish banana seedlings in different substrates and fertilizer sources</strong> - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v30i3.3545

  • Edson Shigueaki Nomura APTA-Pólo Vale do Ribeira
  • Juliana Domingues Lima UNESP
  • Valéria Augusta Garcia APTA
  • Domingues Sávio Rodrigues APTA
Keywords: Musa spp., acclimatization, seedling production

Abstract

With the objective of evaluating the effect of different substrates combined with fertilizers in the growth of micropropagated seedlings of Cavendish banana (Musa spp. AAA), an experiment was conducted in a randomized block design, in a 5 x 3 factorial scheme, with four repetitions. The substrates used were: S1 – subsoil land + carbonized rice hull + Rendmax Floreira®; S2 - subsoil land + carbonized rice hull + Organifol®; S3 - subsoil land + carbonized rice hull + Organifol® 9% SiO; S4 - Technes Vivatto®; S5 - thick sand + carbonized rice hull + Rendmax Floreira®. The fertilizer sources were: SA – without fertilizer; LL – slow-release fertilizer - Osmocote® 3M 14-14-14 (5.0 kg m-3) mixed in the substrate; and LN – normal-release fertilizer, 14-14-14 (7.5 g seedling-1) applied in covering. The height, collar diameter, leaf number, leaf area and dry matter were determined. Based on the differences of growth, substrates S1, S2, S3 and S4 can be used with fertilizer 14-14-14, with slow (5.0 kg m-3) or normal (7.5 g seedling-1) release of nutrients.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Edson Shigueaki Nomura, APTA-Pólo Vale do Ribeira
Agencia Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios - Pólo Vale do Ribeira Área Fitotecnia - Bananicultura e Plantas ornamentais
Published
2008-05-27
How to Cite
Nomura, E. S., Lima, J. D., Garcia, V. A., & Rodrigues, D. S. (2008). <strong>Growth of micropropagated cavendish banana seedlings in different substrates and fertilizer sources</strong&gt; - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v30i3.3545. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 30(3), 359-363. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v30i3.3545
Section
Crop Production

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus