Agronomic performance of transgenic soybean cultivars in Brazilian Cerrado
Abstract
The productive capacity of soybeans is associated with the adaptation of the culture to the cultivation environment. Factors such as a high number of pods, the weight of a thousand grains, and grain number are essential factors in determining cultivars of high productive potential. The launching of new varieties associated with new technologies makes it necessary to know the performance of these varieties in different growing environments. This study aimed to analyze the agronomic performance of transgenic soybean cultivars under Cerrado conditions. The experimental design used completely randomized blocks; six of the twelve cultivars used RR1 technology and the remaining six used RR2BT. The cultivars were grown in five distinct locations in the southwest region of Goiás. The results demonstrated no increments in the grain yield of the RR1 or RR2BT technologies and the precocity of the cultivars also did not favor an increase in grain yield. The localities of Jataí and Rio Verde did not influence the cultivar cycle.
Downloads
References
Beavis, W. D., & Keim, P. (1996). Identification of quantitative trait loci that are affected by environment. In M. S. Kang, & H. G. Gauch (Ed.), Genotype-by-environment interaction (p. 123-149). Boca Raton, FL: EPDF.
Bernardi, O., Malvestiti, G. S., Dourado, P. M., Oliveira, W. S., Martinelli, S., Berger, G. U., & Omoto, C. (2012). Assessment of the high dose concept and level of control provided by MON 87701 × MON 89788 soybean against Anticarsia gemmatalis and Pseudoplusia includens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Brazil. Pest Management Science, 68(7), 1083-1091. DOI: 10.1002/ps.3271
Canfalone, A., & Navarro Dujmovich, M. (2012). Influência do “deficit” hídrico sobre a eficiência da radiação solar em soja. Current Agricultural Science and Technology, 5(3), 195-198.
Carvalho, C. G. P., Arias, C. A. A., Toledo, J. F. F., Almeida, L. A., Kiihl, R. A. D. S., & Oliveira, M. F. (2002). Interação genótipo x ambiente no desempenho produtivo da soja no Paraná. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 37(7), 989-1000.
Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento [CONAB]. (2016). Acompanhamento da safra brasileira de grãos, Safra 2015/2016, Quarto Levantamento. Brasília, DF: CONAB.
Cucolotto, M., Garbuglio, D. D., Pipolo, V. C., Fonseca Junior, N. S., & Kamikoga, M. K. (2007). Genotype x environment interaction in soybean: evaluation through three methodologies. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, 7(3), 270-277.
Daroish, M., Hassan, Z., & Ahad, M. (2005). Influence planting dates and plant densities on photosynthesis capacity, grain and biological yield of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Journal of Agronomy, 4(3), 230-237. DOI: 10.3923/ja.2005.230.237
Destro, D., Carpentieri-Pípolo, V., Kiihl, R. D. S., & Almeida, L. A. (2001). Photoperiodism and genetic control of the long juvenile period in soybean: A review. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, 1(1), 72-92.
Dixon, B. L., Hollinger, S. E., Garcia, P., & Tirupattur, V. (1994). Estimating corn yield response models to predict impacts of climate change. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 19(1), 58-68.
Fageria, N. K., & Santos, A. B. (2008). Yield physiology of dry bean. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 31(6), 983-1004. DOI: 10.1080/01904160802096815
Ferreira, D. F. (2011). Sisvar: a computer statistical analysis system. Ciência e Agrotecnologia, 35(6), 1039-1042. DOI: 10.1590/S1413-70542011000600001
Guzman, P. S., Diers, B. W., Neece, D. J., ST Martin, S. K., Leroy, A. R., Grau, C. R., & Nelson, R. L. (2007). QTL associated with yield in three backcross-derived populations of soybean. Crop Science, 47(1), 111-122. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2006.01.0003
Hassol, S. J. (2009). Global climate change impacts in the United States - 2009 Report. New York, US: Global Change Research Program.
Machado, A. T. (2014). Construção histórica do melhoramento genético de plantas: do convencional ao participativo. Revista Brasileira de Agroecologia, 9(1), 35-50.
Mariano, Z. D. F. A. (2010). Importância da variável climática na produtividade da soja no sudoeste de Goiás. Mercator, 9(1), 121-134.
Mauad, M., Bertoloze, S. T. L., Almeida, N. A. I., & Abreu, V. G. (2011). Influência da densidade de semeadura sobre características agronômicas na cultura da soja. Revista Agrarian, 3(9), 175-181.
Mateus, R. P. G., & Silva, C. M. (2013). Avanços Biotecnológicos na cultura da soja. Campo Digital, 8(2), 23-27.
Navarro Júnior, H. M., & Costa, A. C. (2002). Contribuição relativa dos componentes do crescimento para produção de grãos de soja. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 37(2), 269-274.
Paterniani, E. (2001). Agricultura sustentável nos trópicos. Estudos avançados, 15(43), 303-326. DOI: 10.1590/S0103-40142001000300023
Peluzio, J. M., Afférri, F. S., Monteiro, F. J. F., Melo, A. V., & Pimenta, R. S. (2010). Adaptabilidade e estabilidade de cultivares de soja em várzea irrigada no Tocantins. Revista Ciência Agronômica, 41(3), 427-434.
Rocha, M. M., & Vello, N. A. (1999). Interação genótipos e locais para rendimento de grãos de linhagens de soja com diferentes ciclos de maturação. Bragantia, 58(1), 69-81. DOI: 10.1590/S0006-87051999000100009
Sediyama, T. (2009). Tecnologias de produção e usos da soja. Londrina, PR: Ed. Mecenas.
Sediyama, T. (2013). Tecnologias de produção de sementes de soja. Londrina, PR: Ed. Mecenas Ltda.
Silva, A. G., Teixeira, I. R., Martins, P. D. S., Simon, G. A., & Francischini, R. (2014). Desempenho agronômico e econômico de híbridos de milho na safra de inverno. Agro@mbiente On-line, 8(2), 261-271. DOI: 10.18227/1982-8470ragro.v8i2.1706
Silva, A. G., Francischini, R., & Goulart, M. M. P. (2015). Desempenho agronômico e econômico de híbridos de sorgo granífero na safra de inverno em Montividiu, Góias. Revista de Agricultura, 90(1), 17-30.
Silva, A. G., Francischini, R., & Martins, P. D. S. (2015). Desempenhos agronômico e econômico de cultivares de milho na safra de inverno. Revista Agrarian, 8(27), 1-11.
Tannura, M. A., Irwin, S. H., & Good, D. L. (2008). Weather, technology, and corn and soybean yields in the U.S. corn belt (Marketing and Outlook Research Report 2008-01). Urbana Champaign, US: University of Illinois.
Toledo, J. F. F. D., Carvalho, C. G. P. D., Arias, C. A. A., Almeida, L. A. D., Brogin, R. L., Oliveira, M. F. D., & Hiromoto, D. M. (2006). Genotype and environment interaction on soybean yield in Mato Grosso State, Brazil. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 41(5), 785-791. DOI: 10.1590/S0100-204X2006000500010
United States Department of Agriculture [USDA]. (2016). World agricultural production. Washington, DC, US: USDA. Link: https://downloads.usda.library.cornell.edu/usda-esmis/files/5q47rn72z/j96021078/ww72bb951/worldag-production-06-10-2016.pdf acessado em: 05/09/2017.
Xu, Z., Hennessy, D. A., Sardana, K., & Moschini, G. (2013). The realized yield effect of genetically engineered crops: U.S. maize and soybean. Crop Science, 53(3), 735-745. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2012.06.0399
Zhang, H., Hao, D., Sitoe, H. M., Yin, Z., Hu, Z., Zhang, G., & YU, D. (2015). Genetic dissection of the relationship between plant architecture and yield component traits in soybean (Glycine max) by association analysis across multiple environments. Plant Breeding, 134(5), 564-572. DOI: 10.1111/pbr.12305
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY AND COPYRIGHTS
I Declare that current article is original and has not been submitted for publication, in part or in whole, to any other national or international journal.
The copyrights belong exclusively to the authors. Published content is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) guidelines, which allows sharing (copy and distribution of the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially, under the terms of attribution.
