Economic viability of supplementary irrigation in citrus at northeast of the State Paraná
Abstract
Citrus irrigation in Southern Brazil is supplementary. In some situations it is used to minimize the risks of irregular distribution of rain and in improving the quality of the fruits. There are several kinds of irrigation systems that can be used in citrus. Each system, due to its own efficiency, provides different yield increments when compared to unirrigated crops. Besides, due to its technical and hydraulic characteristics, different irrigation systems increase production costs in different ways. There are three different markets for citrus - fresh fruit, concentrated juice, and in natura export - demanding different use of inputs for its crop production. The study aims to analyze the viability of citrus supplementary irrigation in Maringá, Southern Brazil, using a Decision Analysis’ framework. It was found that citrus irrigation with conventional sprinkler system was not profitable. Drip irrigation, due to its low energy consumption, showed higher expected net returns.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2008-07-14
How to Cite
Rezende, R., Cardoso, C. O., Gonçalves, A. C. A., Peres, F. C., Frizzone, J. A., & Folegatti, M. V. (2008). Economic viability of supplementary irrigation in citrus at northeast of the State Paraná. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 21, 591-598. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v21i0.4292
Issue
Section
Agronomy
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY AND COPYRIGHTS
I Declare that current article is original and has not been submitted for publication, in part or in whole, to any other national or international journal.
The copyrights belong exclusively to the authors. Published content is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) guidelines, which allows sharing (copy and distribution of the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially, under the terms of attribution.
2.0
2019CiteScore
60th percentile
Powered by 
2.0
2019CiteScore
60th percentile
Powered by 