Calibration of two neutron probes in field and laboratory conditions

  • Antonio Carlos S. da Costa IAPAR
  • Rogério Teixeira Faria IAPAR

Abstract

Two different methods were used to calibrate two neutron probes: model CPN 503DR which measures soil water content and CPN 501DR for soil density and water content. The use of drums to hold the soil in the calibration of neutron probe in laboratory condition was appropriate for high clay-content latosol. For low clay-content latosol, a loss of neutrons through the drums was detected. The linear regression equations, determined in both on-field and laboratory conditions for high clay-content latosols, presented slope coefficients similar to the one provided by the manufacturer which, though not determining the real value of soil water content, may be useful to detect the variations of water content in the field. The model CPN 501DR showed lower sensibility to determine the soil water content than the model CPN 503DR.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Rogério Teixeira Faria, IAPAR
Possui graduação em Engenharia Agronômica pela ESALQ/USP (1976), especialização em Land Drainage pelo International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement (1982), especialização em Computer Simulation for Crop Growth pelo International Fertilizer Development Center (1995) , mestrado em Irrigacao e Drenagem pela ESALQ/USP (1981), doutorado em Agricultural Engineering pela McGill University (1993) e pós-doutorado pela ESALQ/USP (1999). Atualmente é Pesquisador C da Área de Engenharia Agrícola do Instituto Agronômico do Paraná. Tem experiência em engenharia agrícola , com ênfase em modelagem e simulação de balanço hídrico e crescimento de cultivos, irrigação, monitoramento agroclimático e previsão de safras Currículo Lattes
Published
2008-07-14
How to Cite
Costa, A. C. S. da, & Faria, R. T. (2008). Calibration of two neutron probes in field and laboratory conditions. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 20, 301-306. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v20i0.4360
Section
Agronomy

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus