Spatial variability of soil macroporosity in irrigated area before soil preparation and after crop harvest using conventional tillage and chiseling
Abstract
In the second semester of 1995, at the Technical Center of Irrigation of Universidade Estadual de Maringá, in Maringá, State of Paraná, Brazil, macroporosity changes between samples collected before soil preparation and after bean crop harvest in two central-pivot-system irrigated plots, one submitted to conventional tillage and the other to chisel plow, were investigated. The conventional tillage reduced the macroporosity value, but increased the soil density average value in the period studied. On the other hand, the chiseling system increased macroporosity average to 83%, which improved aeration, roots development and water infiltration conditions. The initially similar spatial structural dependence of both plots was not modified, except for the fact that chisel plowing reduced the structural nuggets; of the experimental semivariograms, whose range remained the same for both treatments.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2008-07-14
How to Cite
Mata, J. de D. V. da, Gonçalves, A. C. A., & Vieira, S. R. (2008). Spatial variability of soil macroporosity in irrigated area before soil preparation and after crop harvest using conventional tillage and chiseling. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 20, 307-312. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v20i0.4361
Issue
Section
Agronomy
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY AND COPYRIGHTS
I Declare that current article is original and has not been submitted for publication, in part or in whole, to any other national or international journal.
The copyrights belong exclusively to the authors. Published content is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) guidelines, which allows sharing (copy and distribution of the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially, under the terms of attribution.
2.0
2019CiteScore
60th percentile
Powered by 
2.0
2019CiteScore
60th percentile
Powered by 