Garbage compost effects on lettuce production

  • Izabel Cristina dos Santos UFV
  • Vicente Wagner Dias Casali UFV
  • Glauco Vieira Miranda UFV

Abstract

Heavy metals, potassium and sodium absortion and production of lettuce cultivars fertilized with garbage compost were evaluated. The experiment was carried out in a greenhouse with pot-transplanted cultivars of Brasil 48, Grand Rapids, Vitória Verde Clara and Regina 71, fertilized with the following compost doses: 0, 17.5, 35.0 and 52.5t.ha-1. Freshmatter production of leaves was influenced by cultivars and compost doses, being Regina 71 and Vitoria Verde Clara the most productive when 17.5t.ha-1 dose was applied. Compost doses increased significantly Zn, Cu, Mn, K, and Na concentration in lettuce drymatter, and the different cultivars affected Pb, Zn, Cu, K and Na concentration in the drymatter. Cultivars and compost doses interacted as for Cu, Mn, K and Na. Concentration of K and Cu in lettuce leaves was considered normal, while Mn and Zn were low and Na and Pb were high, when the latter exceeded the limit allowed by Brazilian legislation for consumers of vegetables in natura.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Glauco Vieira Miranda, UFV
GLAUCO VIEIRA MIRANDA obteve o título de Doctor Scientiae em Genética e Melhoramento pela Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) em 1998. Realizou o pós-doutorado em transformação de plantas de milho na University of Illinois em 2006/7. É Professor Associado da UFV desde 1997. Os primeiros 10 anos do programa de pesquisa foram dedicados exclusivamente à cultura do milho consolidando a linha de pesquisa MELHORAMENTO DE PLANTAS PARA ESTRESSES ABIÓTICOS utilizando o estado-da-arte da seleção recorrente, genética quantitativa e biotecnologia (PCR e transformação) Currículo Lattes
Published
2008-07-14
How to Cite
Santos, I. C. dos, Casali, V. W. D., & Miranda, G. V. (2008). Garbage compost effects on lettuce production. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 20, 275-280. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v20i0.4364
Section
Agronomy

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus