<b>A chamber for measurement of net photosynthesis on a whole plant</b> - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v29i3.469

  • Celso Jamil Marur IAPAR
  • Rogério Teixeira de Faria IAPAR

Abstract

A limitation for quantifying photosynthesis with existing equipment is that they were designed to measure of plant parts, such as one leaf or group of few leaves, which has a great variability over the whole plant. As a consequence, it is difficult to integrate accurately the measurements taken on plant parts in order to assess the process over the entire plant. The objectives of this work were to show in detail a chamber built to measure whole plant photosynthesis and present measurements taken with this apparatus on coffee plants under field conditions. The chamber makes possible to obtain reliable measurements of CO2 assimilation rates over canopies of different LAI and levels of light exposure. The plant with LAI equal to 1.84 had higher assimilation rates for the whole canopy, but autoshading decreased assimilation rates per leaf area unit, as compared with the plant with LAI of 0.86.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Celso Jamil Marur, IAPAR
Possui graduação em Agronomia pela Universidade Federal do Paraná (1975), mestrado em Biologia Vegetal (Fisiologia Vegetal) pela Universidade Estadual de Campinas (1982) e doutorado em Biologia Vegetal pela Universidade Estadual de Campinas (1993). Atualmente é pesquisador do Instituto Agronômico do Paraná. Atua na área de Agronomia, com ênfase em Fisiologia Vegetal, principalmente nos seguintes temas: estresse abiótico, fotossíntese líquida, estado da água na planta, reguladores de crescimento, prolina, fenologia, algodoeiro, citros, cafeeiro Currículo Lattes
Published
2007-11-28
How to Cite
Marur, C. J., & Faria, R. T. de. (2007). <b>A chamber for measurement of net photosynthesis on a whole plant</b&gt; - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v29i3.469. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 29(3), 415-419. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v29i3.469
Section
Crop Production

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus