<b>Sweet potato clone selection by REML/BLUP procedure</b> - doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v32i4.4837
Keywords:
Ipomoea batatas, mixed model, analysis of deviance, genotypic classification
Abstract
The objective of this work was to classify and select sweet potato clones, using the REML/BLUP methodology. The study was carried out in Rio Largo, Alagoas State, located 127 m above sea level, 9°27’S and 35°27’W. Five clones were evaluated (CL-2, CL-3, CL-4, CL-6 and CL-8) in a randomized complete blocks design with eight replications. The analyzed variables were number of commercial roots (NCR), number of non-commercial roots (NNCR), total number of roots (TNR), aerial part weight (APW), average weight of non-commercial roots (AWNCR), commercial root length (CRL), average weight of commercial roots (AWCR), and diameter of commercial roots (DCR). The analysis of deviance showed that the clones differ statistically for NNCR, TNR, AWNCR, AWCR, CRL and DCR. CL-06 had the best NCRN, NNCR, TNR, AWNCR, AWCR, DCR; CL-03 for APW and CRL, and CL-02 for NCR. By the classification of genotypic averages, the best clone was CL-06.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2010-11-29
How to Cite
Borges, V., Ferreira, P. V., Soares, L., Santos, G. M., & Santos, A. M. M. (2010). <b>Sweet potato clone selection by REML/BLUP procedure</b> - doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v32i4.4837. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 32(4), 643-649. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v32i4.4837
Issue
Section
Genetics and Plant Breeding
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY AND COPYRIGHTS
I Declare that current article is original and has not been submitted for publication, in part or in whole, to any other national or international journal.
The copyrights belong exclusively to the authors. Published content is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) guidelines, which allows sharing (copy and distribution of the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially, under the terms of attribution.
2.0
2019CiteScore
60th percentile
Powered by 
2.0
2019CiteScore
60th percentile
Powered by 