<b>Processing flour product obtained from stationary beet drying</b> - doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v33i2.4885
Keywords:
beet flour, drying, agroindustry, functional food
Abstract
The consumption of dehydrated vegetables has been stimulated for their practical use, higher conservation time compared to in natura varieties, and the possibility of using surplus production, thus reducing the effects of seasonality. This research proposed the production of beet flour, using simple technology and procedures available for the majority of small producers. Different beet slices were compared: longitudinal (long 2; 4.5 and 9 mm) and cross-section (cross 2, 4.5 and 9 mm), about drying and grinding times, drying rates, dry flour yields, and particle size. Considering that the drying rate was low, that the length of time of the product in the dryer was low, that the flour had low particle size, and the ease of preparing slices, the treatments of 4.5 mm slices were recommended for the production of beet flour. The flour presented high dietary fiber, carbohydrate, protein and total mineral contents, and reduced lipid content.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2011-02-16
How to Cite
Araújo Filho, D. G. de, Eidam, T., Borsato, A. V., & Raupp, D. da S. (2011). <b>Processing flour product obtained from stationary beet drying</b> - doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v33i2.4885. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 33(2), 207-214. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v33i2.4885
Issue
Section
Agricultural Engineering
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY AND COPYRIGHTS
I Declare that current article is original and has not been submitted for publication, in part or in whole, to any other national or international journal.
The copyrights belong exclusively to the authors. Published content is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) guidelines, which allows sharing (copy and distribution of the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially, under the terms of attribution.
2.0
2019CiteScore
60th percentile
Powered by 
2.0
2019CiteScore
60th percentile
Powered by 