<b>Selection of indexes for the diagnosis of nitrogen state of basic seed potato</b> - doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v33i2.5724

  • Marialva Alvarenga Moreira Universidade Federal de Viçosa
  • Paulo Cezar Rezende Fontes Universidade Federal de Viçosa
  • Paulo Roberto Cecon Universidade Federal de Viçosa
  • Roberto Fontes Araújo Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária de Minas Gerais
Keywords: Solanum tuberosum L., propagation, critical level

Abstract

The objective of this study was to select indexes for the diagnosis of nitrogen status of basic seed potato planted in pot and to determine the critical value of each index. The indexes, determined in the fourth leaf (QF) and old leaf, at 60 days after planting, were: green intensity (determined by color chart and SPAD), area, length, width, leaflet numbers, fresh and dry weight, N-NO3 contents in the petiole sap and N in the dry matter. Three experiments were set in pot containing substrate in a greenhouse, at University Federal of Viçosa. In each experiment it was utilized one propagation material as tuber seed, mini-tuber and sprout and were evaluated six nitrogen rates (0, 25, 50, 100, 200 and 400 mg dm-3), being 10% of each rate applied at pre-planting time and the remainder was daily applied via irrigation water for 30 days. Each experiment was set in randomized block design with four replications. The final tuber harvest occurred when the plant was completely senescent. SPAD index, N-NO3 contents in the sap and dry matter in the QF significantly correlated with plant N contents and reached different critical values depending upon the propagating material.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2011-02-16
How to Cite
Moreira, M. A., Fontes, P. C. R., Cecon, P. R., & Araújo, R. F. (2011). <b>Selection of indexes for the diagnosis of nitrogen state of basic seed potato</b&gt; - doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v33i2.5724. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 33(2), 335-340. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v33i2.5724
Section
Crop Production

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus