<b>Interaction of lime and zinc levels in the morphologic characteristics and production components of castor bean plants</b> - doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v32i3.5820

  • Erica Pontes Léles FCA UNESP BOTUCATU
  • Dirceu Maximino Fernandes FCA UNESP BOTUCATU
  • José Iran Cardoso da Silva FCA UNESP BOTUCATU
  • Leandro Augusto Andrade Fumes FCA UNESP BOTUCATU
Keywords: Ricinus communis L., castor bean, acidity corrective, micronutrient

Abstract

The objective in this work was to evaluate the effects of lime and zinc levels, as well as their interaction on development in castor bean plants. The hypothesis of this work is that the lime levels reduce the zinc availability in soil for the plant. The experiment was carried out under greenhouse conditions without temperature control, in pots with 17 dm3 of ‘dystrophic Red Latosol’, medium texture. The statistical design was of randomized blocks, in a 3 x 5 factorial scheme, with four replicates. The treatments consisted of liming to reach three basis saturations: 40, 60 and 80%, combined with five zinc levels: 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0 and 8.0 mg dm-3. Only one plant per pot was grown up to 174 days after emergence (first mature raceme), at which point the morphologic and production components of plants were evaluated. Higher lime levels resulted in greater number of seeds per plant and dry matter of seeds per plant. There was interaction of basis saturation and zinc in plant height, in dry matter of root and in length of raceme (masculine part and total). However, none of these increases reflected a significant difference in weight of 100 castor bean seeds.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2010-08-25
How to Cite
Léles, E. P., Fernandes, D. M., Silva, J. I. C. da, & Fumes, L. A. A. (2010). <b>Interaction of lime and zinc levels in the morphologic characteristics and production components of castor bean plants</b&gt; - doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v32i3.5820. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 32(3), 501-509. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v32i3.5820
Section
Crop Production

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus