<b>Distribution of frequency and intense rainfall</b> - doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v33i3.6021
Keywords:
heavy rain, GEV distribution, LH moments
Abstract
The generalized extreme value distribution (GEV) has had great acceptance for discretion of the maximum natural events. Previous studies show that GEV distribution fits values closer to reality when there is need for extrapolation of sampling data for longer periods of returns. In order to contribute to the planning of activities that are influenced by the intensity of precipitated water, we adjusted a model of probability distribution of heavy rain through GEV, using LH moments for estimating its parameters and statistical test proposed by Wang (1998) for checking the quality of the adjustments developed in the Matlab. We analyzed historical time series of maximum rainfall for different durations obtained from rain gauges in the city of Cascavel, Paraná State. Moreover, these series were fitted by Gumbel distribution for purposes of comparison with the GEV. This study shows that the Gumbel distribution underestimates the GEV distribution for large return periods.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2011-04-11
How to Cite
Quadros, L. E. de, Queiroz, M. M. F. de, & Boas, M. A. V. (2011). <b>Distribution of frequency and intense rainfall</b> - doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v33i3.6021. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 33(3), 401-410. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v33i3.6021
Issue
Section
Agricultural Engineering
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY AND COPYRIGHTS
I Declare that current article is original and has not been submitted for publication, in part or in whole, to any other national or international journal.
The copyrights belong exclusively to the authors. Published content is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) guidelines, which allows sharing (copy and distribution of the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially, under the terms of attribution.
2.0
2019CiteScore
60th percentile
Powered by 
2.0
2019CiteScore
60th percentile
Powered by 







































