New orders of 2k factorial designs generated by simulated annealing adapted to optimality criteria
Abstract
The excessive changes in factor levels can lead to a high cost in practice and make it difficult to conduct the experiment, in addition to adding a higher computational cost and loss of the orthogonality property, resulting in numerical proble
Excessive changes in factor levels can lead to a high cost in practice and hinder the conduction of experiments, in addition to adding a higher computational cost and loss of the orthogonality property, resulting in numerical problems in estimating the parameters of a model. The sequential specification of experimental points, seen as treatments in a 2k factorial design, results in a high-order bias in some factors, which is caused by the accumulation of −1 or +1 signals. This study aimed to propose new designs generated by the simulated annealing technique, respecting the main A-optimal and D-optimal optimality criteria as random execution orders that minimize the order bias. This approach allowed the generation of 24 and 25 factorials, which were compared to the designs in standard order. The simulated annealing technique is a viable method to generate optimal designs with the same efficiency as the usual designs to obtain A-optimal and D-optimal designs with new execution orders, which minimize the effect of order bias relative to standard order designs. Regarding efficiency, the generated designs were precise in the variance of model parameter estimates, similar to the original designs.
ms in the estimation of the parameters of a model. The sequential specification of the experimental points, seen as treatments in a 2k factorial design, results in a high order bias in some factors, which is caused by the accumulation of -1 or +1 signals. The objective of this study is to propose new designs generated by the simulate annealing technique, which respects the main A-optimal and D-optimal optimality criteria as random execution orders that minimize order bias. With this approach, 24 and 25 factorials were generated and compared with the designs in standard order. It was concluded that the simulated annealing technique is a viable method to generate optimal designs with the same efficiency as the usual designs. For the generation of A-optimal and D-optimal designs with new execution orders that minimize the effect of order bias in relation to standard order designs. Regarding efficiency, the generated designs were precise in the variance of the estimates of the model parameters, similar to the original designs.
Downloads
References
Abreu, L. R., & Prata, B. A. (2018). A hybrid genetic algorithm for solving the unrelated parallel machine scheduling problem with sequence dependent setup times. IEEE Latin America Transactions, 16(6), 1715-1722. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TLA.2018.8444391
Adams, G. L., Cintas, P. G., & Llabres, X. T. M. (2005). Experimentation order in factorial designs with 8 or 16 runs. Journal of Applied Statistics, 32(3), 297-313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02664760500054731
Atkinson, A. C., Donev, A. N., & Tobias, R. D. (2007). Optimum experimental designs, with SAS. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Correa, A. A., Grima, P., & Tort-Martoreli, X. (2012). Experimentation order in factorial designs: new findings. Journal of Applied Statistics, 39(7), 1577-1591. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2012.661706
Dickinson, A. W. (1974). Some orders requiring a minimum number of factor level changes for 24 and 25 main effects plans. Technometrics, 16(1), 31-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1974.10489146
Elliott, L. J., Eccleston, J. A., & Martin, R. J. (1999). An algorithm for the design of factorial experiments when the data are correlated. Statistics and Computing, 9(3), 195-201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008965829964
Fedorov, V. V. (1972). Theory of optimal experiments. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Goos, P., & Jones, B. (2011). Optimal design of experiments: a case study approach. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Khinkis, L. A., Laurence, L., Faessel, H., & Greco, W. R. (2003). Optimal design for estimating parameters of the 4-parameter Hill model. Nonlinearity in Biology, Toxicology, Medicine, 1(3), 363-377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15401420390249925
Kiefer, J. (1959). Optimal experimental designs (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 21(2), 272-319. DOI: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2983802
Oprime, P. C., Pureza, V. M. M., & Oliveira, S. C. (2017). Sequenciamento sistemático de experimentos fatoriais como alternativa a ordem aleatória. Gestão e Produção, 24(1), 108-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-530X1266-16
Rady, E. A., Abd El-Monsef, M. M. E., & Seyam, M. M. (2009). Relationships among several optimality criteria. InterStat, 247(1), 1-11. Retrieved on Jan. 10, 2023 from https://scholar.cu.edu.eg/?q=elhoussainy/files/10.1.1.586.5137.pdf
Ryan, T. P. (2007). Modern experimental design. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Interscience.
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY AND COPYRIGHTS
I Declare that current article is original and has not been submitted for publication, in part or in whole, to any other national or international journal.
The copyrights belong exclusively to the authors. Published content is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) guidelines, which allows sharing (copy and distribution of the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially, under the terms of attribution.
Funding data
-
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais
-
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Grant numbers 304939/2021-8