<b>Recovery of coffee tree (<em>Coffea Arabica</em> L.) after pruning under different irrigation depths</b> - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v31i2.7039
Keywords:
coffee, irrigation, growth
Abstract
In order to reduce the recovery period of the orchard coffee after pruning, this work was carried out with the objective of evaluating the influence of different irrigation depths and splitting of N and K with fertirrigation on the growth of coffee plants. The experiment was carried out in southern Minas Gerais State with coffea Arabica cv. Topázio MG-1190 implanted with 1.8 x 0.7 m spacing. Irrigations corresponded to 0, 40, 80 and 120% of the evaporation from a Class A pan – precipitation (ECA-P) and N and K split in 4, 8 and 12 applications. A randomized block design with four replications was used. Plant height, diameter of orthotropic branches, number of internodes and crown diameter were evaluated. The fertilizer splitting was found not to provide any increase in growth of the coffee plant. The depth of 120%*ECA-P provided the greatest growth of coffee plants when compared to others.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2009-05-14
How to Cite
Arantes, K. R., Faria, M. A. de, & Rezende, F. C. (2009). <b>Recovery of coffee tree (<em>Coffea Arabica</em> L.) after pruning under different irrigation depths</b> - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v31i2.7039. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 31(2), 313-319. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v31i2.7039
Issue
Section
Crop Production
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY AND COPYRIGHTS
I Declare that current article is original and has not been submitted for publication, in part or in whole, to any other national or international journal.
The copyrights belong exclusively to the authors. Published content is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) guidelines, which allows sharing (copy and distribution of the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially, under the terms of attribution.
2.0
2019CiteScore
60th percentile
Powered by 
2.0
2019CiteScore
60th percentile
Powered by 







































