<b>Economic feasibility of pineapple culture in the Caiuá sandstone area, northwestern Paraná</b> - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v31i2.7041
Keywords:
Ananas comosus, production cost, profitability
Abstract
The northwestern region of the state of Paraná, in the Caiuá sandstone area, lacks options for economically feasible agricultural exploration. Thus, pineapple appears as a growth option, needing further studies regarding its exploration in that region. The present review aimed to evaluate the feasibility of this culture and analyze the competitiveness of this region of Umuarama, Paraná State, compared to the state’s main pineapple supplying regions. For this purpose, three producers in Umuarama, Cafezal do Sul and Cruzeiro do Oeste were visited, in order to survey the technical coefficient of this culture and its profit indicators. The analyzed region presents a good and competitive capacity compared to other traditional fruit producers, mainly due to the proximity of consumer markets. Pineapple is an excellent choice of culture in the familiar agricultural context.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2009-05-14
How to Cite
Leal, A. J. F., Hora, R. C. da, Tonin, T. A., & Boliani, A. C. (2009). <b>Economic feasibility of pineapple culture in the Caiuá sandstone area, northwestern Paraná</b> - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v31i2.7041. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 31(2), 353-358. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v31i2.7041
Issue
Section
Crop Production
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY AND COPYRIGHTS
I Declare that current article is original and has not been submitted for publication, in part or in whole, to any other national or international journal.
The copyrights belong exclusively to the authors. Published content is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) guidelines, which allows sharing (copy and distribution of the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially, under the terms of attribution.
2.0
2019CiteScore
60th percentile
Powered by 
2.0
2019CiteScore
60th percentile
Powered by 







































